Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22270643›Full record

ArticleNature chemistry2012

Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs.

G Richard Bickerton, Gaia V Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, Andrew L Hopkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 810 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
810citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

810 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ChemLint: Conversational Cheminformatics with Large Language Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  10. PockLigGPT: Pocket-Sequence-Conditioned Molecular Generation with GPTs and RL.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  11. Data-Driven Critical Evaluation of the General Solubility Equation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

750 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G Richard BickertonDivision of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Gaia V Paolini
Jérémy Besnard
Sorel Muresan
Andrew L Hopkins

Funding

Wellcome Trust 083481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-likeness is a key consideration when selecting compounds during the early stages of drug discovery. However, evaluation of drug-likeness in absolute terms does not reflect adequately the whole spectrum of compound quality. More worryingly, widely used rules may inadvertently foster undesirable molecular property inflation as they permit the encroachment of rule-compliant compounds towards their boundaries. We propose a measure of drug-likeness based on the concept of desirability called the quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED). The empirical rationale of QED reflects the underlying distribution of molecular properties. QED is intuitive, transparent, straightforward to implement in many practical settings and allows compounds to be ranked by their relative merit. We extended the utility of QED by applying it to the problem of molecular target druggability assessment by prioritizing a large set of published bioactive compounds. The measure may also capture the abstract notion of aesthetics in medicinal chemistry.

Indexed as

Empirical ResearchPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID22270643
PMCPMC3524573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.