ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2012
Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03395756 (Investigation of the Potential for Intramuscular Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate as Emergency Contraception), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of the Potential for Intramuscular Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate as Emergency Contraception
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2012Pooled it
- Engineering a smart intrauterine device based on pH-controlled copper release.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
- Reversible female contraceptives: historical, current, and future perspectives†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Review
- Emergency contraceptive knowledge and associated factors among abortion experienced reproductive age women in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis using EDHS 2016 data.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Improving access to highly effective emergency contraception: an assessment of barriers and facilitators to integrating the levonorgestrel IUD as emergency contraception using two applications of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- The potential for intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate as a self-bridging emergency contraceptive.Contraception: X · 2021Article
- Exploring the Availability of Emergency Contraception in New Brunswick Pharmacies: A Mystery-Client Telephone Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception and beyond: a systematic review update.International journal of women's health · 2019Article
- Improving LARC Access for Urban Adolescents and Young Adults in the Pediatric Primary Care Setting.Clinical pediatrics · 2019Article
- The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?Contraception · 2018Article
- State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2018Review
- Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.Contraception · 2016Article
- Emergency contraception: A multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices.Contraception · 2016Article
- Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2014Review
- Emerging options for emergency contraception.Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health · 2013Review
- Changes in U.S. Healthcare Provider Practices Related to Emergency Contraception.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe copper intrauterine device (IUD) is the most effective emergency contraceptive available but is largely ignored in clinical practice. We examined clinicians' recommendations of the copper IUD for emergency contraception in a setting with few cost obstacles.
methodsWe conducted a survey among clinicians (n=1,246; response rate 65%) in a California State family planning program, where U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives are available at no cost to low-income women. We used multivariable logistic regression to measure the association of intrauterine contraceptive training and evidence-based knowledge with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception.
resultsThe large majority of clinicians (85%) never recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, and most (93%) required two or more visits for an IUD insertion. Multivariable analyses showed insertion skills were associated with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, but the most significant factor was evidence-based knowledge of patient selection for IUD use. Clinicians who viewed a wide range of patients as IUD candidates were twice as likely to have recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception. Although more than 93% of obstetrician-gynecologists were skilled in inserting the copper IUD, they were no more likely to have recommended it for emergency contraception than other physicians or advance practice clinicians.
conclusionRecommendation of the copper IUD for emergency contraception is rare, despite its high efficacy and long-lasting contraceptive benefits. Recommendation would require clinic flow and scheduling adjustments to allow same-day IUD insertions. Patient-centered and high-quality care for emergency contraception should include a discussion of the most effective method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.