Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22270272›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2012

Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Cynthia C Harper, J Joseph Speidel, Eleanor A Drey, James Trussell, Maya Blum, Philip D Darney

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03395756 (Investigation of the Potential for Intramuscular Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate as Emergency Contraception), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03395756 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Potential for Intramuscular Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate as Emergency Contraception

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsEmergency Contraception, ContraceptionArmsDepot-Medroxyprogestereone Acetate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Emerging options for emergency contraception.Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health · 2013
    Review
  17. Changes in U.S. Healthcare Provider Practices Related to Emergency Contraception.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cynthia C HarperBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. harperc@obgyn.ucsf.edu
J Joseph Speidel
Eleanor A Drey
James Trussell
Maya Blum
Philip D Darney
Reproductive Science Center · US

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
NICHD NIH HHS 24HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe copper intrauterine device (IUD) is the most effective emergency contraceptive available but is largely ignored in clinical practice. We examined clinicians' recommendations of the copper IUD for emergency contraception in a setting with few cost obstacles.

methodsWe conducted a survey among clinicians (n=1,246; response rate 65%) in a California State family planning program, where U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives are available at no cost to low-income women. We used multivariable logistic regression to measure the association of intrauterine contraceptive training and evidence-based knowledge with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception.

resultsThe large majority of clinicians (85%) never recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, and most (93%) required two or more visits for an IUD insertion. Multivariable analyses showed insertion skills were associated with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, but the most significant factor was evidence-based knowledge of patient selection for IUD use. Clinicians who viewed a wide range of patients as IUD candidates were twice as likely to have recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception. Although more than 93% of obstetrician-gynecologists were skilled in inserting the copper IUD, they were no more likely to have recommended it for emergency contraception than other physicians or advance practice clinicians.

conclusionRecommendation of the copper IUD for emergency contraception is rare, despite its high efficacy and long-lasting contraceptive benefits. Recommendation would require clinic flow and scheduling adjustments to allow same-day IUD insertions. Patient-centered and high-quality care for emergency contraception should include a discussion of the most effective method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceContraception, PostcoitalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntrauterine Devices, CopperAdultCaliforniaData CollectionEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeFemaleGynecologyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID22270272
PMCPMC3266549
OpenAlexW2059378683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.