Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22270174›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2012

Validation that metabolic tumor volume predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer.

Chad Tang, James D Murphy, Brian Khong, Trang H La, Christina Kong, Nancy J Fischbein, A Dimitrios Colevas, Andrei H Iagaru, Edward E Graves, Billy W Loo and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictive Value of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influence of Semiquantitative [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. CT and FDG-PET radiologic biomarkers in p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. PET-based prognostic survival model after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  18. VolumetricHead & neck · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chad TangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
James D Murphy
Brian Khong
Trang H La
Christina Kong
Nancy J Fischbein
A Dimitrios Colevas
Andrei H Iagaru
Edward E Graves
Billy W Loo
Quynh-Thu Le

Funding

TUMOR HYPOXIA--MOLECULAR STUDIES &CLINICAL EXPLOITATIONP01CA067166 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LE, QUYNH-THU XUAN · 1996 to 2017
$25.5M
Defining Molecular Markers for Tumor HypoxiaR01CA118582 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LE, QUYNH-THU XUAN · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS 5P01-CA67166-15NCI NIH HHS P01 CA067166NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118582NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118582-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe have previously reported that metabolic tumor volume (MTV) obtained from pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxydeglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)/ computed tomography (CT) predicted outcome in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC). The purpose of this study was to validate these results on an independent dataset, determine whether the primary tumor or nodal MTV drives this correlation, and explore the interaction with p16(INK4a) status as a surrogate marker for human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The validation dataset in this study included 83 patients with squamous cell HNC who had a FDG PET/CT scan before receiving definitive radiotherapy. MTV and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) were calculated for the primary tumor, the involved nodes, and the combination of both. The primary endpoint was to validate that MTV predicted progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary analyses included determining the prognostic utility of primary tumor vs. nodal MTV.

resultsSimilarly to our prior findings, an increase in total MTV of 17 cm(3) (difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles) was associated with a 2.1-fold increase in the risk of disease progression (p = 0.0002) and a 2.0-fold increase in the risk of death (p = 0.0048). SUV(max) was not associated with either outcome. Primary tumor MTV predicted progression-free (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.94; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 1.57; p < 0.0001) survival, whereas nodal MTV did not. In addition, MTV predicted progression-free (HR = 4.23; p < 0.0001) and overall (HR = 3.21; p = 0.0029) survival in patients with p16(INK4a)-positive oropharyngeal cancer.

conclusionsThis study validates our previous findings that MTV independently predicts outcomes in HNC. MTV should be considered as a potential risk-stratifying biomarker in future studies of HNC.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansKarnofsky Performance StatusLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID22270174
PMCPMC3337958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.