Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22268303›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2011

Medical registrars in 2010: experience and expectations of the future consultant physicians of the UK.

Andrew F Goddard, Timothy Evans, Christopher Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inpatient care: should the general physician now take charge?Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2012
    Article
  11. Driven to it.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2012
    Article
  12. Let's hear it for the medical registrar.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew F GoddardMedical Workforce Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London. andrew.goddard@derbyhospitals.nhs.uk
Timothy Evans
Christopher Phillips

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2010, 2,176 medical registrars in England (43%) responded to a survey of attitudes to current and future working conditions. Regarding current working, 88% were currently happy with their job with respect to their specialty but only 49% were happy with respect to acute medicine. Even if pay was increased, 59% would only want to work a 48-hour week or less. Regarding future jobs, 59% were worried about future job prospects with 91% exploring ways of extending their training. Only 36% would consider working away from their current location as a consultant, only 42% of those trained in acute medicine wish to take part in the acute take, 15% would consider a 'sub-consultant' post and only 60% were looking forward to becoming a consultant. The findings of this survey show that medical registrars are very concerned about their future. From their perspective, clinical medicine in England is in poor health.

Indexed as

ConsultantsData CollectionEmploymentHumansMedical Staff, HospitalUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID22268303
PMCPMC4952330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.