Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22268089›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2013

Intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced MR cisternography: a comprehensive review.

O Algin, B Turkbey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Discovery of Abundant Nano-scale Lymphatic-like Vessels in Brains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radionuclide Cisternography with [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Surgical treatment of post-inflammatory hydrocephalus. Analysis of 101 cases.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

O AlginDepartment of Radiology, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey. droktayalgin@gmail.com
B Turkbey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CE-MRC has been in use for the past 15 years and was reported to be a useful method in the evaluation of CSF disorders and hydrocephalus. The use of CE-MRC in conjunction with other MR imaging techniques has been shown to be effective in selected cases for the evaluation of several disorders of cerebrospinal system. CE-MRC has certain advantages over other cisternographic studies with fewer side effects if performed properly. Although intrathecal Gd administration is not widely accepted yet, several recent studies have reported the safety of small-dose intrathecal gadolinium injection. In this review, we describe CE-MRC and review recent applications in several clinical conditions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain DiseasesCerebrospinal FluidChildFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansImage EnhancementInjections, SpinalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyelographySpinal Cord DiseasesGadolinium DTPA

Identifiers

PMID22268089
PMCPMC7966334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.