Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22267852›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2012

Molecular alterations between the primary breast cancer and the subsequent locoregional/metastatic tumor.

Robyn Macfarlane, Melanie Seal, Caroline Speers, Ryan Woods, Hamad Masoudi, Samuel Aparicio, Stephen K Chia

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04241237 (Concordance Between Liquid and Tissue Biopsy in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04241237 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Concordance Between Liquid and Tissue Biopsy in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2020 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsBlood Draw
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reliable Biomarkers to Identify New and Recurrent Cancer.European journal of breast health · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. St Gallen molecular subtypes in feline mammary carcinoma and paired metastases-disease progression and clinical implications from a 3-year follow-up study.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robyn MacfarlaneDepartment of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6. robyn.macfarlane@cdha.nshealth.ca
Melanie Seal
Caroline Speers
Ryan Woods
Hamad Masoudi
Samuel Aparicio
Stephen K Chia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic breast cancers have historically been presumed to have the same predictive biomarkers as the initial primary tumor. We compared the expression of these biomarkers in a large paired tissue microarray (TMA) series of primary and subsequent relapsed tumors.

methodsUsing the British Columbia Cancer Agency Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit database, patients with biopsy-proven relapses were identified and linked to a large TMA series of primary breast cancers from 1986-1992. Charts were reviewed, and tissue blocks of the metastatic cancer were collected to create a separate TMA. Immunohistochemical assessment with the same antibodies and conditions was performed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 on both the primary and relapsed tumors.

resultsOne hundred sixty cases were received that had tumor adequate for analyses. Of these, 71.9% had no changes in either the ER or PR status or HER-2 status. Of the 45 (28.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2%-35.1%) tumors that did have changes in receptor status, 7.5% were in-breast recurrences or new breast primaries, 4.4% had changes in PR status only and were therefore deemed clinically irrelevant, and 19.4% (95% CI, 13.3%-25.5%) had changes in either the ER or HER-2 status from regional or distant relapses. Five percent of tumors had a receptor status change going from ER(+) or PR(+) to ER(-) or PR(-); 9.4% went from ER(-) or PR(-) to ER(+) or PR(+). With regard to HER-2 status, 3.8% of tumors went from positive to negative and 1.3% went from negative to positive. For all discordant cases, biopsies of the relapsed lesion were obtained prior to initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic disease. In the primary tumors that were ER(+), time to relapse was significantly shorter in the discordant relapsed cases than in the concordant ones (p = .0002). Changes in loss or gain of either biomarker were seen across the discordant cases.

conclusionsA significant proportion of relapsed tumors had changes in either ER or HER-2 status, which would dramatically alter treatment recommendations and clinical behavior. This study suggests that biopsies of relapsed and metastatic breast cancers should be performed routinely in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTissue Array AnalysisERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID22267852
PMCPMC3286165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.