ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2012
Cardio-ventilatory coupling in young healthy resting subjects.
Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02441192 (Cardiovascular and Cardiorespiratory Coupling After Different Types of Training and Detraining), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cardiovascular and Cardiorespiratory Coupling After Different Types of Training and Detraining
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- State Space Correspondence and Cross-Entropy Methods in the Assessment of Bidirectional Cardiorespiratory Coupling in Heart Failure.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia in healthy human.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Scan-associated anxiety (scanxiety): the enigma of emotional breathing oscillations at 0.32 Hz (19 bpm).Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Dynamics of ventilatory pattern variability and Cardioventilatory Coupling during systemic inflammation in rats.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Article
- Assessing cardiorespiratory interactions via lagged joint symbolic dynamics during spontaneous and controlled breathing.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Article
- Heartbeats entrain breathing via baroreceptor-mediated modulation of expiratory activity.Experimental physiology · 2021Article
- Cardioventilatory Control in Preterm-born Children and the Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018Article
- Cardiorespiratory Coordination after Training and Detraining. A Principal Component Analysis Approach.Frontiers in physiology · 2016Article
- Cardiorespiratory coupling: common rhythms in cardiac, sympathetic, and respiratory activities.Progress in brain research · 2014Review
- Quantifying interactions between real oscillators with information theory and phase models: application to cardiorespiratory coupling.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, cardio-ventilatory coupling (CVC) refers to the statistical relationship between the onset of either inspiration (I) or expiration (E) and the timing of heartbeats (R-waves) before and after these respiratory events. CVC was assessed in healthy, young (<45 yr), resting, supine subjects (n = 19). Four intervals were analyzed: time from I-onset to both the prior R-wave (R-to-I) and the following R-wave (I-to-R), as well as time from E-onset to both the prior R-wave (R-to-E) and following R-wave (E-to-R). The degree of coupling was quantified in terms of transformed relative Shannon entropy (tRSE), and χ(2) tests based on histograms of interval times from 200 breaths. Subjects were studied twice, from 5 to 27 days apart, and the test-retest reliability of CVC measures was computed. Several factors pointed to the relative importance of the R-to-I interval compared with other intervals. Coupling was significantly stronger for the R-to-I interval, coupling reliability was largest for the R-to-I interval, and only tRSE for the R-to-I interval was correlated with height, weight, and body surface area. The high test-retest reliability for CVC in the R-to-I interval provides support for the hypothesis that CVC strength is a subject trait. Across subjects, a peak ~138 ms prior to I-onset was characteristic of CVC in the R-to-I interval, although individual subjects also had earlier peaks (longer R-to-I intervals). CVC for the R-to-I interval was unrelated to two separate measures of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), suggesting that these two forms of coupling (CVC and RSA) are independent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.