Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22266872›Full record

ArticleOncogene2012

Regulation of IMP3 by EGFR signaling and repression by ERβ: implications for triple-negative breast cancer.

S Samanta, V M Sharma, A Khan, A M Mercurio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. IGF2BPs as novel mGenes & diseases · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting IGF2BP3 in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S SamantaDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
V M Sharma
A Khan
A M Mercurio
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUMass Memorial Medical Center · US

Funding

INTEGRIN FUNCTION AND SIGNALING IN CARCINOMA PROGRESSIONR01CA080789 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MERCURIO, ARTHUR M · 1999 to 2012
$4.7M
MECHANISMS OF BREAST CARCINOMA SURVIVALR01CA089209 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MERCURIO, ARTHUR M · 2001 to 2010
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA80789NCI NIH HHS CA89209NCI NIH HHS R01 CA080789NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) is emerging as a useful indicator of the progression and outcome of several cancers. IMP3 expression is associated with triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBCs), which are aggressive tumors associated with poor outcome. In this study, we addressed the hypothesis that signaling pathways, which are characteristic of TNBCs, impact the expression of IMP3 and that IMP3 contributes to the function of TNBCs. The data obtained reveal that IMP3 expression is repressed specifically by estrogen receptor β (ERβ) and its ligand 3βA-diol but not by ERα. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and consequent activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway induce IMP3 transcription and expression. Interestingly, we discovered that the EGFR promoter contains an imperfect estrogen response element and that ERβ represses EGFR transcription. These data support a mechanism in which ERβ inhibits IMP3 expression indirectly by repressing the EGFR. This mechanism relates to the biology of TNBC, which is characterized by diminished ERβ and increased EGFR expression. We also demonstrate that IMP3 contributes to the migration and invasion of breast carcinoma cells. Given that IMP3 is an mRNA-binding protein, we determined that it binds several key mRNAs that could contribute to migration and invasion, including CD164 (endolyn) and MMP9. Moreover, expression of these mRNAs is repressed by ERβ and enhanced by EGFR signaling, consistent with our proposed mechanism for the regulation of IMP3 expression in breast cancer cells. Our findings show that IMP3 is an effector of EGFR-mediated migration and invasion and they provide the first indication of how this important mRNA-binding protein is regulated in cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticSignal TransductionBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleHumansReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA-Binding ProteinsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsEstrogen Receptor betaIGF2BP3 protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22266872
PMCPMC3337950
OpenAlexW2043379458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.