Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22266273›Full record

ArticleCytokine2012

Oral microbial biofilm stimulation of epithelial cell responses.

Rebecca Peyyala, Sreenatha S Kirakodu, Karen F Novak, Jeffrey L Ebersole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytokine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Serum cytokines in periodontal diseases.Periodontology 2000 · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathogenic Mechanisms ofFrontiers in oral health · 2022
    Review
  7. The Regulatory Effect of Coaggregation BetweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential Response of Oral Mucosal and Gingival Cells toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genetics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiofilm and Anti-Inflammatory Activities ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca PeyyalaCenter for Oral Health Research, College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. rpeyy1@email.uky.edu
Sreenatha S Kirakodu
Karen F Novak
Jeffrey L Ebersole
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Analyses of Host-Biofilm Interactions: A Novel Polymicrobial ModelR21DE018177 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI NOVAK, KAREN F. · 2008 to 2009
$403k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE018177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral bacterial biofilms trigger chronic inflammatory responses in the host that can result in the tissue destructive events of periodontitis. However, the characteristics of the capacity of specific host cell types to respond to these biofilms remain ill-defined. This report describes the use of a novel model of bacterial biofilms to stimulate oral epithelial cells and profile select cytokines and chemokines that contribute to the local inflammatory environment in the periodontium. Monoinfection biofilms were developed with Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus gordonii, Actinomyces naeslundii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis on rigid gas-permeable contact lenses. Biofilms, as well as planktonic cultures of these same bacterial species, were incubated under anaerobic conditions with a human oral epithelial cell line, OKF4, for up to 24h. Gro-1α, IL1α, IL-6, IL-8, TGFα, Fractalkine, MIP-1α, and IP-10 were shown to be produced in response to a range of the planktonic or biofilm forms of these species. P. gingivalis biofilms significantly inhibited the production of all of these cytokines and chemokines, except MIP-1α. Generally, the biofilms of all species inhibited Gro-1α, TGFα, and Fractalkine production, while F. nucleatum biofilms stimulated significant increases in IL-1α, IL-6, IL-8, and IP-10. A. naeslundii biofilms induced elevated levels of IL-6, IL-8 and IP-10. The oral streptococcal species in biofilms or planktonic forms were poor stimulants for any of these mediators from the epithelial cells. The results of these studies demonstrate that oral bacteria in biofilms elicit a substantially different profile of responses compared to planktonic bacteria of the same species. Moreover, certain oral species are highly stimulatory when in biofilms and interact with host cell receptors to trigger pathways of responses that appear quite divergent from individual bacteria.

Indexed as

BiofilmsActinomycesAnaerobiosisCell LineChemokinesCytokinesEpithelial CellsFusobacterium nucleatumHumansMouthPlanktonPorphyromonas gingivalisStreptococcusStreptococcus gordoniiStreptococcus oralisChemokinesCytokines

Identifiers

PMID22266273
PMCPMC4091036
OpenAlexW1975891067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.