ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology
Longitudinal study of cardiac remodelling in rabbits following infarction.
Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic analysis of serum and myocardium in compensated heart failure after myocardial infarction.Life sciences · 2019Article
- Monitoring reperfused myocardial infarction with delayed left ventricular systolic dysfunction in rabbits by longitudinal imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018Article
- Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of biventricular function in the rabbit, animal model in cardiovascular research: feasibility and normal values.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- Implantation of a Poly-L-Lactide GCSF-Functionalized Scaffold in a Model of Chronic Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2017Article
- Association of hypercholesterolemia and cardiac function evaluated by speckle tracking echocardiography in a rabbit model.Lipids in health and disease · 2014Article
- How similar are the mice to men? Between-species comparison of left ventricular mechanics using strain imaging.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiac remodelling following myocardial infarction (MI) is a complex, dynamic process. There have been few longitudinal studies of these changes.
methodsA 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was performed on 20 rabbits, before and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after MI (n = 14) and twice for controls (n = 6). Chronic left ventricular (LV) infarct size was histologically characterized and correlated with mechanical function. A linear mixed model was used to analyze longitudinal and infarct size-related changes in LV end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), ejection fraction (EF), sphericity, circumferential strain, and wall motion score index.
resultsMean LV infarct size was 28.9% ± 9.3%. After MI, rapid remodelling occurred in LVESV, LVEF, and sphericity for 2 weeks and LVEDV for 4 weeks, with slower changes afterwards. LV infarct size correlated with LVESV (r = 0.76), LVEDV (r = 0.71), and LVEF (r = 0.69). Larger infarcts resulted in greater LVESV dilation (P = 0.04) and faster LVEDV (P < 0.01), LVEF (P < 0.01), and sphericity (P < 0.01) remodelling. Apical global circumferential strain and wall motion score index increased for 1 week, then stabilized, regardless of infarct size, and apical global circumferential strain was correlated with apical infarction (r = 0.58). Additionally, regional circumferential strain decreased in segments with severe (> 80%) infarction more quickly (P < 0.01) and by a greater degree (P = 0.04) compared with segments with minor (< 20%) infarction.
conclusionsThe most dynamic remodelling of cardiac function in this model occurred during the first 4 weeks, stabilizing thereafter, with changes maintained up to 12 weeks. Infarct size affected both the early rate and long-term extent of mechanical remodelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.