Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22265643›Full record

ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2012

Application of network analysis parameters in risk-based surveillance - examples based on cattle trade data and bovine infections in Sweden.

Jenny Frössling, Anna Ohlson, Camilla Björkman, Nina Håkansson, Maria Nöremark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Welfare of cattle during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Contact chains of cattle farms in Great Britain.Royal Society open science · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny FrösslingDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-751 89 Uppsala, Sweden. jenny.frossling@sva.se
Anna Ohlson
Camilla Björkman
Nina Håkansson
Maria Nöremark
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SESwedish Veterinary Agency · SEUniversity of Skövde · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial resources may limit the number of samples that can be collected and analysed in disease surveillance programmes. When the aim of surveillance is disease detection and identification of case herds, a risk-based approach can increase the sensitivity of the surveillance system. In this paper, the association between two network analysis measures, i.e. 'in-degree' and 'ingoing infection chain', and signs of infection is investigated. It is shown that based on regression analysis of combined data from a recent cross-sectional study for endemic viral infections and network analysis of animal movements, a positive serological result for bovine coronavirus (BCV) and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) is significantly associated with the purchase of animals. For BCV, this association was significant also when accounting for herd size and regional cattle density, but not for BRSV. Examples are given for different approaches to include cattle movement data in risk-based surveillance by selecting herds based on network analysis measures. Results show that compared to completely random sampling these approaches increase the number of detected positives, both for BCV and BRSV in our study population. It is concluded that network measures for the relevant time period based on updated databases of animal movements can provide a simple and straight forward tool for risk-based sampling.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCommerceCoronavirus, BovineCoronavirus InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus, BovineRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsSentinel SurveillanceSwedenTransportation

Identifiers

PMID22265643
PMCPMC7114171
OpenAlexW2010370230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.