Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22264979›Full record

ReviewValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2012

A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders.

Jonathan Tosh, John Brazier, Philippa Evans, Louise Longworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Assessment of the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based quality of life measures in people with Parkinson's: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. EQ-5D in skin conditions: an assessment of validity and responsiveness.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Mapping From Visual Acuity to EQ-5D, EQ-5D With Vision Bolt-On, and VFQ-UI in Patients With Macular Edema in the LEAVO Trial.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. An exploratory study to test the impact on three "bolt-on" items to the EQ-5D.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2015
    Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Health state utilities associated with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan ToshHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK. j.tosh@sheffield.ac.uk
John Brazier
Philippa Evans
Louise Longworth

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review examines generic preference-based measures and their ability to reflect health-related quality of life in patients with visual disorders.

methodsA systematic search was undertaken to identify clinical studies of patients with visual disorders where health state utility values were measured and reported. Data were extracted to assess the validity and responsiveness of the measures. A narrative synthesis of the data was undertaken due to the heterogeneity between different studies.

resultsThere was considerable heterogeneity in the 31 studies identified in terms of patient characteristics, visual disorders, and outcomes reported. Vision loss was associated with a reduction in scores across the preference-based measure, but the evidence on validity and responsiveness was mixed. The EQ-5D health-related assessment instrument's performance differed according to condition, with poor performance in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy. The more limited evidence on the HUI-3 instrument found it performed best in differentiating between severity groups of patients with glaucoma, AMD, cataracts, and diabetic retinopathy. One study reported data on the SF-6D instrument and showed it was able to differentiate between patients with AMD.

conclusionsThe performance of the EQ-5D in visual disorders was mixed. The HUI-3 seemed to perform better in some conditions, but the evidence on this and SF-6D is limited. More head to head comparisons of these three measures are required. The new five-level version of EQ-5D may do better at the milder end of visual function.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth Status IndicatorsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID22264979
PMCPMC3268858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.