Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22264049›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV research2012

Animal models for microbicide studies.

Ronald S Veazey, Robin J Shattock, Per Johan Klasse, John P Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. On-demand microbicide products: design matters.Drug delivery and translational research · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of the vaginal environment of Macaca mulatta and Macaca nemestrina throughout the menstrual cycle.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2014
    Review
  17. Rectal microbicide development.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ronald S VeazeyDivision of Comparative Pathology, Tulane National Primate Research Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, Covington, LA 70433, USA. rveazey@tulane.edu
Robin J Shattock
Per Johan Klasse
John P Moore

Funding

Testing practical microbicides in macaquesU19AI076982 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI VEAZEY, RONALD S. · 2008 to 2012
$7.9M
Mouse studiesU19AI070302 · NIAID · IMMUNE DISEASE INSTITUTE, INC. · PI MANOHARAN, MUTHIAH · 2006 to 2009
$7.6M
Developing RANTES analogues as topical strategies to prevent HIV transmissionU19AI076981 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LEDERMAN, MICHAEL MARCEL · 2008 to 2010
$5.7M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800020CNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI070302NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI076981NIAID NIH HHS U19AI076981NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI076982NIAID NIH HHS U19AI76982PHS HHS HHSN27220800020C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been encouraging recent successes in the development of safe and effective topical microbicides to prevent vaginal or rectal HIV-1 transmission, based on the use of anti-retroviral drugs. However, much work remains to be accomplished before a microbicide becomes a standard element of prevention science strategies. Animal models should continue to play an important role in pre-clinical testing, with emphasis on safety, pharmacokinetic and efficacy testing.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdministration, TopicalAnimalsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAnti-Retroviral AgentsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHIV-1HIV InfectionsMacaca mulattaMiceRabbitsRatsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID22264049
PMCPMC3712901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.