Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22263709›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse2012

Medication-assisted treatment in criminal justice agencies affiliated with the criminal justice-drug abuse treatment studies (CJ-DATS): availability, barriers, and intentions.

Peter D Friedmann, Randall Hoskinson, Michael Gordon, Robert Schwartz, Timothy Kinlock, Kevin Knight, Patrick M Flynn, Wayne N Welsh, Lynda A R Stein, Stanley Sacks and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pharmacotherapy for opioid addiction in community corrections.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter D FriedmannDivision of General Internal Medicine, RhodeIsland Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA. pfriedmann@lifespan.org
Randall Hoskinson
Michael Gordon
Robert Schwartz
Timothy Kinlock
Kevin Knight
Patrick M Flynn
Wayne N Welsh
Lynda A R Stein
Stanley Sacks
Daniel J O'Connell
Hannah K Knudsen
Michael S Shafer
Elizabeth Hall
Linda K Frisman
Mat Working Group Of CJ-Dats
Friends Research Institute · USTexas Christian University · USRhode Island Hospital · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USApplied Behavioral Research (United States) · USTemple University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Continuum of Care for Drug-Involved OffendersU01DA016191 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI FRIEDMANN, PETER D, STEIN, LYNDA A · 2002 to 2013
$6.7M
NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is underutilized in the treatment of drug-dependent, criminal justice populations. This study surveyed criminal justice agencies affiliated with the Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS) to assess use of MAT and factors influencing use of MAT. A convenience sample (N = 50) of criminal justice agency respondents (e.g., jails, prisons, parole/probation, and drug courts) completed a survey on MAT practices and attitudes. Pregnant women and individuals experiencing withdrawal were most likely to receive MAT for opiate dependence in jail or prison, whereas those reentering the community from jail or prison were the least likely to receive MAT. Factors influencing use of MAT included criminal justice preferences for drug-free treatment, limited knowledge of the benefits of MAT, security concerns, regulations prohibiting use of MAT for certain agencies, and lack of qualified medical staff. Differences across agency type in the factors influencing use and perceptions of MAT were also examined. MAT use is largely limited to detoxification and maintenance of pregnant women in criminal justice settings. Use of MAT during the community reentry period is minimal. Addressing inadequate knowledge and negative attitudes about MAT may increase its adoption, but better linkages to community pharmacotherapy during the reentry period might overcome other issues, including security, liability, staffing, and regulatory concerns. The CJ-DATS collaborative MAT implementation study to address inadequate knowledge, attitudes, and linkage will be described.

Indexed as

AdultBuprenorphineCrimeCriminal LawData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrisonsSubstance-Related DisordersBuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID22263709
PMCPMC3295578
OpenAlexW2128188449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.