Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22262886›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Command and compensation in a neuromodulatory decision network.

Haojiang Luan, Fengqiu Diao, Nathan C Peabody, Benjamin H White

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gene Expression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TheFrontiers in neural circuits · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haojiang LuanLaboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Fengqiu Diao
Nathan C Peabody
Benjamin H White
National Institute of Mental Health · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Identifying Neural Substrates of Behavior in Drosophila MelanogasterZIAMH002800 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI WHITE, BENJAMIN H · 2009 to 2025
$29.2M
Identifying Neural Substrates of Behavior in Drosophila MelanogasterZ01MH002800 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI WHITE, BENJAMIN H · 2003 to 2008
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002800Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural circuits that mediate behavioral choices must not only weigh internal demands and environmental circumstances, but also select and implement specific actions, including associated visceral or neuroendocrine functions. Coordinating these multiple processes suggests considerable complexity. As a consequence, even circuits that support simple behavioral decisions remain poorly understood. Here we show that the environmentally sensitive wing expansion decision of adult fruit flies is coordinated by a single pair of neuromodulatory neurons with command-like function. Targeted suppression of these neurons using the Split Gal4 system abrogates the fly's ability to expand its wings in the face of environmental challenges, while stimulating them forces expansion by coordinately activating both motor and neuroendocrine outputs. The arbitration and implementation of the wing expansion decision by this neuronal pair may illustrate a general strategy by which neuromodulatory neurons orchestrate behavior. Interestingly, the decision network exhibits a plasticity that is unmasked under conducive environmental conditions in flies lacking the function of the command-like neuromodulatory neurons. Such flies can often expand their wings using a motor program distinct from that of wild-type animals and controls. This compensatory program may be the vestige of an ancestral, environmentally insensitive program used for wing expansion that existed before the evolution of the environmentally adaptive program currently used by Drosophila and other cyclorrhaphan flies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalCentral Nervous SystemChoice BehaviorDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEnvironmentGene Expression RegulationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMotor ActivityNeural PathwaysNeuronsPhysical StimulationTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsGAL4 protein, DrosophilaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22262886
PMCPMC3491898
OpenAlexW1979089661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.