ReviewThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2011
Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.
Review in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Review of response rates over time in registry-based studies using patient-reported outcome measures.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Preoperative knee joint hypothermia reduces inflammation and recovery time and increases range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Trial
- The trajectory of patient-reported outcomes after hip preservation surgery: A National Registry Study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor: How Much Does Prosthetic Joint Infection and Its Successful Treatment Affect Patient-reported Quality of Life?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- How Much Does Prosthetic Joint Infection and Its Successful Treatment Affect Patient-reported Quality of Life?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Observational
- Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- A Nomogram for Predicting Non-Response to Surgery One Year after Elective Total Hip Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Article
- Comparison of the effect and clinical value in general anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures.EFORT open reviews · 2019Review
- Assessment of patient centredness through patient-reported experience measures (ASPIRED): protocol of a mixed-methods study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Study protocol for an observational register-based study on health and risk factors in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis.BMJ open · 2018Article
- The PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire Correlates With the QuickDASH in Patients With Upper Extremity Illness.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018Observational
- Framework To Guide The Collection And Use Of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In The Learning Healthcare System.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2017Article
- Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness in orthopedics: how to measure outcomes and deliver value in a constantly changing healthcare environment.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2017Review
- How Comprehensive and Efficient Are Patient-Reported Outcomes for Rotator Cuff Tears?Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.