ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2012
In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05307965 (Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Thrombus Burden Reduction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction - RETRIEVE-AMI Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Thrombus Burden Reduction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction - RETRIEVE-AMI Study
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Pooled it
- Cutting vs standard balloon for lesion preparation in drug-coated balloon-only PCI: the NATURE randomised trial.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Trial
- Quantitative Coronary Angiography Guidance for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Consensus document on the clinical application of invasive functional coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2024Review
- Angiography and optical coherence tomography derived shear stress: are they equivalent in my opinion?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- T and Small Protrusion (TAP) Technique in Bifurcations: Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients after COVID-19 Pneumonia.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Unravelling the Fate of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Virtual (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve: Future Role in Acute Coronary Syndromes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Overview of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Flow Ratio in the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.US cardiology · 2020Review
- The Evolution of Data Fusion Methodologies Developed to Reconstruct Coronary Artery Geometry From Intravascular Imaging and Coronary Angiography Data: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Deep learning segmentation of major vessels in X-ray coronary angiography.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Accuracy of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for predicting physiological significance of coronary stenosis: a FAVOR II substudy.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2019Article
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease: A perfusion mapping study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Observational
- Low Coronary Wall Shear Stress Is Associated With Severe Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2018Article
- Comparison of coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging with fractional flow reserve for coronary artery disease evaluation: An anatomical-functional mismatch.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2018Review
- Vessel centerline reconstruction from non-isocentric and non-orthogonal paired monoplane angiographic images.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- Impact of vessel curvature on neointimal healing after stent implantation as assessed by optical coherence tomography.Medicine · 2018Article
- Relationship Between Coronary Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio and Myocardial Ischemia Assessed by SPECT MPI.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to compare lumen dimensions as assessed by 3D quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), and to assess the association of the discrepancy with vessel curvature. Coronary lumen dimensions often show discrepancies when assessed by X-ray angiography and by IVUS or OCT. One source of error concerns a possible mismatch in the selection of corresponding regions for the comparison. Therefore, we developed a novel, real-time co-registration approach to guarantee the point-to-point correspondence between the X-ray, IVUS and OCT images. A total of 74 patients with indication for cardiac catheterization were retrospectively included. Lumen morphometry was performed by 3D QCA and IVUS or OCT. For quantitative analysis, a novel, dedicated approach for co-registration and lumen detection was employed allowing for assessment of lumen size at multiple positions along the vessel. Vessel curvature was automatically calculated from the 3D arterial vessel centerline. Comparison of 3D QCA and IVUS was performed in 519 distinct positions in 40 vessels. Correlations were r = 0.761, r = 0.790, and r = 0.799 for short diameter (SD), long diameter (LD), and area, respectively. Lumen sizes were larger by IVUS (P < 0.001): SD, 2.51 ± 0.58 mm versus 2.34 ± 0.56 mm; LD, 3.02 ± 0.62 mm versus 2.63 ± 0.58 mm; Area, 6.29 ± 2.77 mm(2) versus 5.08 ± 2.34 mm(2). Comparison of 3D QCA and OCT was performed in 541 distinct positions in 40 vessels. Correlations were r = 0.880, r = 0.881, and r = 0.897 for SD, LD, and area, respectively. Lumen sizes were larger by OCT (P < 0.001): SD, 2.70 ± 0.65 mm versus 2.57 ± 0.61 mm; LD, 3.11 ± 0.72 mm versus 2.80 ± 0.62 mm; Area 7.01 ± 3.28 mm(2) versus 5.93 ± 2.66 mm(2). The vessel-based discrepancy between 3D QCA and IVUS or OCT long diameters increased with increasing vessel curvature. In conclusion, our comparison of co-registered 3D QCA and invasive imaging data suggests a bias towards larger lumen dimensions by IVUS and by OCT, which was more pronounced in larger and tortuous vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.