Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012
A phase II study of gefitinib for aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pruritus in patients treated with targeted cancer therapies: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2013Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with afatinib for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (neoCHANCE-2): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Trial
- Pilot Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced, Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Gefitinib for patients with incurable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm phase II clinical trial.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2017Trial
- Perioperative Systemic Therapy for High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- The Role of Cetuximab in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Emerging Strategies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Targeted Drug Delivery in Periorbital Non-Melanocytic Skin Malignancies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exploring the Therapeutic Implications of Co-Targeting the EGFR and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Pathways in Oral Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Alone or Combined with EGFR-Directed Targeted Therapy or Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Lacrimal Sac and Nasolacrimal Duct Carcinomas.Seminars in ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant Approaches to Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Aggressive Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Targeting receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: Avenues in the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.iScience · 2023Review
- The mitochondrial RNA polymerase POLRMT promotes skin squamous cell carcinoma cell growth.Cell death discovery · 2022Article
- The State of the Art of Radiotherapy for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of the Literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Immunotherapy and Systemic Treatment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2021Review
- Cancer-associated miRNAs and their therapeutic potential.Journal of human genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the disease control rate and toxicity of treating patients with aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) with neoadjuvant gefitinib. EXPERIMENTAL
designA prospective phase II clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant gefitinib given prior to standard treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Patients with stable disease after one cycle received escalated doses. Patients who responded were given gefitinib during radiation therapy, as well as maintenance therapy after definitive treatment. We analyzed the correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, mutation status, and gene copy number on available tissue samples and clinical response.
resultsTwenty-three patients were accrued and 22 patients were evaluable for response prior to definitive local treatment; complete responses were attained by 18.2% of patients and partial responses by 27.3%. Grades 2 to 3 toxicities were observed in 59.1% of patients experiencing class-specific effects during induction therapy. After induction, 11.8% underwent surgery alone, 17.6% had definitive radiation, 11.8% were treated with radiation and concurrent gefitinib, and 47% had surgery with postoperative radiation and concurrent gefitinib. Median follow-up for the censored observations was 32 months. Two-year overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival rates were 72.1%, 72.1%, and 63.6%, respectively. No EGFR-activating mutations were identified in tumor samples available from 10 patients. No associations between EGFR correlative studies and patient outcomes were identified.
conclusionsGefitinib, in the neoadjuvant setting, was active and well tolerated in patients with aggressive CSCC and did not interfere with definitive treatment. In view of the 18% complete response rate we observed, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be further explored in the treatment of aggressive CSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.