Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22261702›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2012

Genetic factors modulating the response to stimulant drugs in humans.

Amy B Hart, Harriet de Wit, Abraham A Palmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy B Hart
Harriet de Wit
Abraham A Palmer

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
Systems Genetic Analysis of Methamphetamine's Motivational Effects in a Mouse AILR01DA021336 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PALMER, ABRAHAM A · 2006 to 2015
$4.0M
Weighted genome-wide association study of amphetamine sensitivity in humansR03DA027545 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PALMER, ABRAHAM A · 2009 to 2010
$466k
NIDA NIH HHS DA021336NIDA NIH HHS DA027545NIDA NIH HHS DA02812NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021336NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA027545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals vary in their responses to stimulant drugs, and several lines of evidence suggest that the basis for this variation is at least partially genetic in origin. Association studies have examined the effects of polymorphisms in specific genes on acute and chronic responses to stimulant drugs. Several of these genetic polymorphisms are also associated with other psychiatric dimensions and disorders.This chapter examines the evidence for genetic associations between the genes that have been most carefully examined for their influence on the response to stimulant drugs.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsCentral Nervous System StimulantsGene Expression RegulationGenetic Association StudiesHumansMental DisordersPolymorphism, GeneticTwin Studies as TopicCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID22261702
PMCPMC3388157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.