Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22261306›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2012

Improving the prediction of the brain disposition for orally administered drugs using BDDCS.

Fabio Broccatelli, Caroline A Larregieu, Gabriele Cruciani, Tudor I Oprea, Leslie Z Benet

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and drugability.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabio BroccatelliDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0912, USA.
Caroline A Larregieu
Gabriele Cruciani
Tudor I Oprea
Leslie Z Benet
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERSU01GM061390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIACOMINI, KATHLEEN M · 2000 to 2009
$29.2M
Pharmacogenomics of Membrane TransportersU19GM061390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YEE, SOOK WAH · 2010 to 2014
$16.3M
Yeast Biology ConsortiumU54MH084690 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI TEGOS, GEORGE P · 2008 to 2013
$14.4M
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND PHARMACOGENOMICST32GM007175 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AHITUV, NADAV, KROETZ, DEANNA L · 1985 to 2021
$7.1M
Transporter-Enzyme Interplay Evaluation via Microfluidiic HTS Cell Culture DeviceR21GM075900 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BENET, LESLIE Z · 2006 to 2008
$1.1M
Chemical Pattern Detection and Visualization in Biological NetworksR21GM095952 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI OPREA, TUDOR I · 2011 to 2012
$415k
NCI NIH HHS CA-118100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NIGMS NIH HHS GM-095952NIGMS NIH HHS GM-61390NIGMS NIH HHS GM-75900NIGMS NIH HHS GM-90457NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM075900NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM095952NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007175NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM007175NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061390NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061390NIMH NIH HHS MH-084690NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH084690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modeling blood-brain barrier (BBB) passage, in silico models have yielded ~80% prediction accuracy, and are currently used in early drug discovery. Being derived from molecular structural information only, these models do not take into account the biological factors responsible for the in vivo outcome. Passive permeability and P-glycoprotein (Pgp, ABCB1) efflux have been successfully recognized to impact xenobiotic extrusion from the brain, as Pgp is known to play a role in limiting the BBB penetration of oral drugs in humans. However, these two properties alone fail to explain the BBB penetration for a significant number of marketed central nervous system (CNS) agents. The Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) has proved useful in predicting drug disposition in the human body, particularly in the liver and intestine. Here we discuss the value of using BDDCS to improve BBB predictions of oral drugs. BDDCS class membership was integrated with in vitro Pgp efflux and in silico permeability data to create a simple 3-step classification tree that accurately predicted CNS disposition for more than 90% of 153 drugs in our data set. About 98% of BDDCS class 1 drugs were found to markedly distribute throughout the brain; this includes a number of BDDCS class 1 drugs shown to be Pgp substrates. This new perspective provides a further interpretation of how Pgp influences the sedative effects of H1-histamine receptor antagonists.

Indexed as

BiopharmaceuticsAdministration, OralAnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BBlood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansModels, NeurologicalPermeabilityPharmacokineticsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID22261306
PMCPMC3496430
OpenAlexW2022113679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.