Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22260902›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological measurement2012

Biomechanical examination of the 'plateau phenomenon' in ActiGraph vertical activity counts.

Dinesh John, Ross Miller, Sarah Kozey-Keadle, Graham Caldwell, Patty Freedson

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological measurement, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The multivariate physical activity signature associated with metabolic health in children.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dinesh JohnDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. djohn1@kin.umass.edu
Ross Miller
Sarah Kozey-Keadle
Graham Caldwell
Patty Freedson

Funding

Development of an Integrated Measurement System to Assess Physical ActivityU01CA130783 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FREEDSON, PATTY S. · 2007 to 2010
$2.3M
Novel Analytic Techniques to Assess Physical ActivityR01CA121005 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FREEDSON, PATTY S. · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
Advancing Physical Activity Measurement Using Pattern Recognition TechniquesRC1HL099557 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FREEDSON, PATTY S. · 2009 to 2010
$985k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121005NCI NIH HHS R01CA121005NCI NIH HHS U01 CA130783NCI NIH HHS UO1CA130783NHLBI NIH HHS RC1 HL099557NHLBI NIH HHS RC1HL099557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper determines if the leveling off ('plateau/inverted-U' phenomenon) of vertical ActiGraph activity counts during running at higher speeds is attributable to the monitor's signal filtering and acceleration detection characteristics. Ten endurance-trained male participants (mean (SD) age = 28.2 (4.7) years) walked at 3, 5 and 7 km h(-1), and ran at 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 km h(-1) on a force treadmill while wearing an ActiGraph GT3X monitor at the waist. Triaxial accelerations of the body's center of mass (CoM) and frequency content of these accelerations were computed from the force treadmill data. GT3X vertical activity counts demonstrated the expected 'plateau/inverted-U' phenomenon. In contrast, vertical CoM accelerations increased with increasing speed (1.32 ± 0.26 g at 10 km h(-1) and 1.68 ± 0.24 g at 20 km h(-1)). The dominant frequency in the CoM acceleration signals increased with running speed (14.8 ± 3.2 Hz at 10 km h(-1) and 24.8 ± 3.2 Hz at 20 km h(-1)) and lay beyond the ActiGraph band-pass filter (0.25 to 2.5 Hz) limits. In conclusion, CoM acceleration magnitudes during walking and running lie within the ActiGraph monitor's dynamic acceleration detecting capability. Acceleration signals of higher frequencies that are eliminated by the ActiGraph band-pass filter may be necessary to distinguish among exercise intensity at higher running speeds.

Indexed as

AccelerationModels, BiologicalActigraphyAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestHipHumansMaleTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22260902
PMCPMC3392095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.