Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22260337›Full record

Trial reportAddiction biology2013

Subjective, cognitive and cardiovascular dose-effect profile of nabilone and dronabinol in marijuana smokers.

Gillinder Bedi, Ziva D Cooper, Margaret Haney

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Evaluating the Abuse Potential of Lenabasum, a Selective Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Agonist.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The effect of nabilone on appetite, nutritional status, and quality of life in lung cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Marijuana's dose-dependent effects in daily marijuana smokers.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2013
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Pharmacotherapy for Cannabis Use Disorder: Preclinical and Clinical Models.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gillinder BediDivision on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY, USA.
Ziva D Cooper
Margaret Haney
Columbia University · US

Funding

PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF MARIJUANA DEPENDENCEP50DA009236 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI KLEBER, HERBERT DAVID · 1994 to 2013
$39.4M
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Decisions to Smoke Marijuana and Cocaine in HumansK23DA034877 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BEDI, GILLINDER I. · 2013 to 2017
$930k
Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Marijuana on Smoked CocaineK01DA027755 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI COOPER, ZIVA D · 2010 to 2014
$929k
NIDA NIH HHS DA09236NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA027755NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA034877NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marijuana dependence is a substantial public health problem, with existing treatments showing limited efficacy. In laboratory and clinical studies, the cannabinoid receptor 1 agonist oral Δ9tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; dronabinol) has been shown to decrease marijuana withdrawal but not relapse. Dronabinol has poor bioavailability, potentially contributing to its failure to decrease relapse. The synthetic THC analogue, nabilone, has better bioavailability than dronabinol. We therefore aimed to characterize nabilone's behavioral and physiological effects across a range of acute doses in current marijuana smokers and compare these with dronabinol's effects. Participants (4 female; 10 male) smoking marijuana 6.6 (standard deviation = 0.7) days/week completed this outpatient, within-subjects, double-blind, randomized protocol. Over seven sessions, the time-dependent subjective, cognitive and cardiovascular effects of nabilone (2, 4, 6, 8 mg), dronabinol (10, 20 mg) and placebo were assessed. Nabilone (4, 6, 8 mg) and dronabinol (10, 20 mg) increased ratings of feeling a good effect, a strong effect and/or 'high' relative to placebo; nabilone had a slower onset of peak subjective effects than dronabinol. Nabilone (6, 8 mg) modestly lowered psychomotor speed relative to placebo and dronabinol. There were dose-dependent increases in heart rate after nabilone, and nabilone (2 mg) and dronabinol (10 mg) decreased systolic blood pressure. Thus, nabilone produced sustained, dose-related increases in positive mood, few cognitive decrements and lawful cardiovascular alterations. It had a longer time to peak effects than dronabinol, and effects were more dose-related, suggesting improved bioavailability. Nabilone was well tolerated by marijuana smokers, supporting further testing as a potential medication for marijuana dependence.

Indexed as

AdultAffectAnalysis of VarianceBiological AvailabilityBlood PressureCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedPlacebosCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinolnabilonePlacebosAgonist treatmentdose-effect profiledronabinolmarijuana dependencenabilone

Identifiers

PMID22260337
PMCPMC3335956
OpenAlexW2112216060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.