Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22259640›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2011

Prescription prevalence and continuing medication use for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the reality of care revealed by claims data analysis.

Sandra Mangiapane, Reinhard Busse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New technologies for intensive prevention programs after myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the NET-IPP trial.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Atorvastatin treatment and LDL cholesterol target attainment in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra MangiapaneZentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 3, 10623 Berlin, Germany. smangiapane@zi-berlin.de
Reinhard Busse
Zentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines recommend using aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, statins, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although there is evidence that patients often stop taking these medications prematurely, long-term data reflecting the actual reality of care are lacking. We studied prescription prevalence and treatment persistence of secondary prevention in patients who had an AMI by analyzing relevant claims data from a German sickness fund, the Techniker Krankenkasse (these data are not necessarily representative of the entire German population).

methodsInsurees who were discharged from the hospital between 2001 and 2006 with AMI as their main discharge diagnosis were classified as users or non-users of each of the types of drug listed above on the basis of the prescriptions that they obtained in the first 90 days after they left the hospital. Treatment persistence was statistically assessed with survival analysis. Switches from one drug class to another were not examined.

resultsOf 30,028 AMI patients, 82% were initially prescribed a beta-blocker, 73% a statin, 69% an ACE inhibitor, 66% aspirin (without self-medication), and 61% clopidogrel. Five years after discharge, 10% of the patients for whom aspirin was initially prescribed were still taking it; the corresponding figures for the other drug classes were 17% for statins, 31% for ACE inhibitors, and 36% for beta-blockers. The greatest drop in treatment persistence occurred approximately one year after the AMI.

conclusionTreatment persistence with recommended medication after AMI is still in need of improvement. Patient education should start as soon as possible after infarction, because the greatest drops in medication use appear to occur within one year after AMI.

Indexed as

Insurance Claim ReviewAgedCardiotonic AgentsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePrescriptionsPrevalenceSecondary PreventionCardiotonic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22259640
PMCPMC3258576
OpenAlexW1542608457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.