Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22258969›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Lise Lotte Gluud, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Ebbe Langholz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fasting for haemostasis in children with gastrointestinal bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Recombinant factor VIIa as haemostatic therapy in advanced liver disease.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2013
    Review
  18. Liver disease, coagulopathies and transfusion therapy.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lise Lotte GluudDepartment of InternalMedicine, Gentofte UniversityHospital, Hellerup,Denmark.liselottegluud@yahoo.dk.
Sarah Louise Klingenberg
Ebbe Langholz
Gentofte Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranexamic acid reduces haemorrhage through its antifibrinolytic effects. In a previous version of the present review, we found that tranexamic acid may reduce mortality. The present review includes updated searches of randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine or lansoprazole.

objectivesTo assess the effects of tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. SEARCH

methodsElectronic searches (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index) and manual searches were combined. The last search update was in October 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials in which patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomised to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo, or any anti-ulcer drug, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome measure. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed and results presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup, sensitivity, regression and sequential analyses were performed to analyse sources of intertrial heterogeneity and the robustness of the overall result. MAIN

resultsSeven double blind randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine, or lanzoprazole were included. One trial offered endoscopic treatment to all patients that were randomised. Random-effects model meta-analysis found that tranexmic acid reduced mortality compared with placebo (41 of 829 versus 68 of 825 patients; RR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.89). The beneficial effect was not confirmed in subgroup analysis stratified for the quality of bias control, in worst case scenario analyses (in which 21% of the randomised patients were excluded), or in sequential analyses. No significant differences were found between tranexamic acid and placebo on bleeding, surgery, or transfusion requirements. No clear effects of tranexamic acid were identified in trials using endoscopic therapy or in the trials comparing tranexamic acid with cimetidine or lansoprazole. In the tranexamic acid group, five cases of serious thromboembolic events occurred (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and cerebral infarction). Overall, the number of patients with any thrombotic event was not significantly increased in the tranexamic acid group (RR 1.87, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.85). AUTHORS'

conclusionsConsidering the internal and external validity of the evidence, tranexamic acid cannot be recommended for routine use. Additional trials in which tranexamic acid is used in combination with the currently recommended interventions are required.

Indexed as

2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesAdministration, OralAluminum HydroxideAntifibrinolytic AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsCimetidineDrug CombinationsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansInjections, IntravenousLansoprazoleMagnesiumMagnesium HydroxideRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranexamic Acid2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesaluminium hydroxide, magnesium carbonate drug combinationAluminum HydroxideAntifibrinolytic AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsCimetidineDrug CombinationsLansoprazoleMagnesiumMagnesium HydroxideTranexamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID22258969
OpenAlexW4256614068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.