Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22258709›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Failure of the smallpox vaccine to develop a skin lesion in vaccinia virus-naïve individuals is related to differences in antibody profiles before vaccination, not after.

Xiaolin Tan, Sookhee Chun, Jozelyn Pablo, Philip Felgner, Xiaowu Liang, D Huw Davies

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolin TanDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Sookhee Chun
Jozelyn Pablo
Philip Felgner
Xiaowu Liang
D Huw Davies
University of California, Irvine · USAntigen Discovery (United States) · US

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
CLINICAL &REGULATORY AFFAIRS SUPPORT CONTRACTN01AI005413 · NIAID · FISHER BIOSERVICES, INC. · PI BEARDSLEY, DENNIS · 2000 to 2000
$7.7M
Multiplex Serodiagnostic Protein MicroarrayU01AI078213 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FELGNER, PHILIP LOUIS · 2008 to 2012
$3.7M
Seriodiagnostic arrays for biodefense and emerging infectious diseasesR44AI058365 · NIAID · IMMPORT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI DAVIES, DAVID HUW · 2008 to 2010
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI005413NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040097NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-40097NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI058365NIAID NIH HHS R44-AI-58365NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI078213NIAID NIH HHS U01AI078213NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359NIAID NIH HHS U54AI065359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful vaccination against smallpox with conventional vaccinia virus is usually determined by the development of a vesicular skin lesion at the site of vaccinia inoculation, called a "take." Although previous vaccination is known to be associated with attenuation of the take, the immunology that underlies a no-take in vaccinia-naïve individuals is not well understood. We hypothesized that antibody profiling of individuals before and after receiving vaccinia virus would reveal differences between takes and no-takes that may help better explain the phenomenon. Using vaccinia virus proteome microarrays and recombinant protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), we first examined the antibody response in vaccinia-naïve individuals that failed to take after receiving different doses of the replication-competent DryVax and Aventis Pasteur (APSV) smallpox vaccines. Most that received diluted vaccine failed to respond, although four no-takes receiving diluted vaccine and four receiving undiluted vaccine mounted an antibody response. Interestingly, their antibody profiles were not significantly different from those of controls that did show a take. However, we did find elevated antibody titers in no-takes prior to receiving DryVax that were significantly different from those of takes. Although the sample size studied was small, we conclude the failure to take in responders correlates with preexisting immunity of unknown etiology that may attenuate the skin reaction in a way similar to previous smallpox vaccination.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansProtein Array AnalysisSkinSmallpox VaccineVaccinia virusViral ProteinsAntibodies, ViralSmallpox VaccineViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22258709
PMCPMC3294614
OpenAlexW2109258470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.