ReviewCancer biology & therapy2012
Selective tumor killing based on specific DNA-damage response deficiencies.
Review in Cancer biology & therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting MUS81 promotes the anticancer effect of WEE1 inhibitor and immune checkpoint blocking combination therapy via activating cGAS/STING signaling in gastric cancer cells.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Article
- Review
- The transcription factor Cux1 in cerebellar granule cell development and medulloblastoma pathogenesis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2014Article
- E1B and E4 oncoproteins of adenovirus antagonize the effect of apoptosis inducing factor.Virology · 2014Article
- Trial Watch: Targeting ATM-CHK2 and ATR-CHK1 pathways for anticancer therapy.Molecular & cellular oncologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organisms constantly undergo various stresses within their life span, which can damage their DNA. In order to maintain genomic stability and counteract the development of unwanted genomic mutations, organisms have evolved a DNA-damage response (DDR) to protect their genome. Due to the critical roles played by DDR in genomic stability, its defects can lead to cellular transformation and potentially tumorigenesis. Consequently, this also provides the opportunity to specifically target tumor cells due to a weakened ability to tolerate genotoxic stresses. In this lies a treatment strategy in which the inhibition of remaining DDR pathways can hyper-sensitize tumors to chemotherapeutic agents while minimizing deleterious effects to healthy cells. Therefore it is important to understand the genotypic background of specific tumors to determine which DDR pathways remain and can be targeted for inhibition. Tumor therapies based on the DDR are ideal not only as a means of increasing the effectiveness of current chemotherapies but also as a means to selectively target tumor cells while leaving healthy cells unharmed. Thus, targeting DDR components as a means of increasing effectiveness and discrimination of current chemotherapeutic tumor treatments is currently the focus of many studies and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.