ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2012
Results of an online community needs assessment for psychoeducational interventions among partners of hereditary breast cancer previvors and survivors.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use and taxonomy of social media in cancer-related research: a systematic review.American journal of public health · 2014Pooled it
- Psychosocial burdens and unmet supportive care needs of partners and relatives of individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: A mixed-methods study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Understanding the sexual health perceptions, concerns, and needs of female partners of prostate cancer survivors.The journal of sexual medicine · 2023Article
- A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020Article
- Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2014Article
- Supportive care during treatment for breast cancer: resource allocations in low- and middle-income countries. A Breast Health Global Initiative 2013 consensus statement.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2013Review
- Online information exchanges for parents of children with a rare health condition: key findings from an online support community.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpouses and partners ("partners") of women at-risk for ("previvors") and surviving with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer are a primary source of support within their families. Yet, little is known about partners' needs for psychoeducational intervention to enhance their cancer risk knowledge, coping, and support role functioning.
objectiveTo determine the type and range of need for psychoeducational intervention among partners of hereditary breast cancer previving and surviving women, and to understand the potential role of the Internet and other communication channels in meeting that need.
methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis on partners' needs that were originally assessed via an online community-based organization devoted to hereditary breast cancer. Partners' demographic characteristics, need for psychoeducation, and likelihood of using various communication channels were assessed along with other constructs. Analyses examined commonly-occurring clusters of likely intervention use and by communication channel.
resultsPartners (n =143) endorsed a moderately high level of need for psychoeducation and did so across multiple content areas (e.g., role functioning, decision making, communication, intimacy). Factor analysis identified three commonly-preferred communication channels: 1) self-help materials, 2) online interactions, and 3) interpersonal interactions. A cluster analysis among these factors identified three groups of partners based on their likelihood of psychoeducational intervention use (low [18%], moderate [55%], and high [27%] users). In a covariate-adjusted MANOVA, moderate and high intervention users reported significantly greater need for psychoeducation compared to low users (F(2,132) = 9.15, P < .001).
conclusionsA majority of assessed partners perceived a need for psychoeducational interventions surrounding hereditary breast cancer risk. Internet-based, interactive resources may be an efficient mechanism to reach large numbers of partners with tailored content. Research is warranted to inform the design and deployment of these resources to ensure quality and high impact, and ultimately to examine ways to integrate these resources into clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.