Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22257650›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2012

Results of an online community needs assessment for psychoeducational interventions among partners of hereditary breast cancer previvors and survivors.

Kenneth P Tercyak, Darren Mays, Tiffani A DeMarco, McKane E Sharff, Susan Friedman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2014
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth P TercyakGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States. tercyakk@georgetown.edu
Darren Mays
Tiffani A DeMarco
McKane E Sharff
Susan Friedman
Georgetown University Medical Center · USFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

Parent Communication of BRCA1/2 Test Results to ChildrenR01HG002686 · NHGRI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TERCYAK, KENNETH · 2003 to 2009
$3.1M
Adolescents' Long-Term Adaptation to Familial Cancer RisksR01CA137625 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TERCYAK, KENNETH · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA137625NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137625NHGRI NIH HHS HG002686NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpouses and partners ("partners") of women at-risk for ("previvors") and surviving with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer are a primary source of support within their families. Yet, little is known about partners' needs for psychoeducational intervention to enhance their cancer risk knowledge, coping, and support role functioning.

objectiveTo determine the type and range of need for psychoeducational intervention among partners of hereditary breast cancer previving and surviving women, and to understand the potential role of the Internet and other communication channels in meeting that need.

methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis on partners' needs that were originally assessed via an online community-based organization devoted to hereditary breast cancer. Partners' demographic characteristics, need for psychoeducation, and likelihood of using various communication channels were assessed along with other constructs. Analyses examined commonly-occurring clusters of likely intervention use and by communication channel.

resultsPartners (n =143) endorsed a moderately high level of need for psychoeducation and did so across multiple content areas (e.g., role functioning, decision making, communication, intimacy). Factor analysis identified three commonly-preferred communication channels: 1) self-help materials, 2) online interactions, and 3) interpersonal interactions. A cluster analysis among these factors identified three groups of partners based on their likelihood of psychoeducational intervention use (low [18%], moderate [55%], and high [27%] users). In a covariate-adjusted MANOVA, moderate and high intervention users reported significantly greater need for psychoeducation compared to low users (F(2,132) = 9.15, P < .001).

conclusionsA majority of assessed partners perceived a need for psychoeducational interventions surrounding hereditary breast cancer risk. Internet-based, interactive resources may be an efficient mechanism to reach large numbers of partners with tailored content. Research is warranted to inform the design and deployment of these resources to ensure quality and high impact, and ultimately to examine ways to integrate these resources into clinical care.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeeds AssessmentSpousesBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPatient Education as TopicSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID22257650
PMCPMC3846342
OpenAlexW2032694710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.