Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22255943›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2011

A pipeline for copy number variation detection based on principal component analysis.

Jiayu Chen, Jingyu Liu, David Boutte, Vince D Calhoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiayu ChenElectrical Engineering Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. jychen@ece.unm.edu
Jingyu Liu
David Boutte
Vince D Calhoun

Funding

Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
A multilevel vulnerability study of substance abuse via CNV, brain activation andR21DA027626 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI LIU, JINGYU · 2009 to 2010
$412k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB005846NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA027626NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA copy number variation (CNV), an important structural variation, is known to be pervasive in the human genome and the determination of CNVs is essential to understanding their potential effects on the susceptibility to diseases. However, CNV detection using SNP array data is challenging due to the low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, we propose a principal component analysis (PCA) based approach for data correction, and present a novel processing pipeline for reliable CNV detection. Tested data include both simulated and real SNP array datasets. Simulations demonstrate a substantial reduction in the false positive rate of CNV detection after PCA-correction. And we also observe a significant improvement in data quality in real SNP array data after correction.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAnalysis of VarianceComputer SimulationDNAFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansMaleNormal DistributionPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisDNA

Identifiers

PMID22255943
PMCPMC4197848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.