Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22254264›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2011

Measurement error robustness of a closed-loop minimal sampling method for HIV therapy switching.

E Fabian Cardozo, Ryan Zurakowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Resistance evolution in HIV - modeling when to intervene.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2012
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E Fabian CardozoElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. fabianc@udel.edu
Ryan Zurakowski

Funding

Analysis of Differential Resistance Emergence Risk for Differential Treatment AppR21AI078842 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ZURAKOWSKI, RYAN M · 2009 to 2010
$396k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI078842NIAID NIH HHS R21AI078842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We test the robustness of a closed-loop treatment scheduling method to realistic HIV viral load measurement error. The purpose of the algorithm is to allow the accurate detection of an induced viral load minimum with a reduced number of samples. Therapy must be switched at or near the viral-load minimum to achieve optimal therapeutic benefit; therapeutic benefit decreases logarithmically with increased viral load at the switching time. The performance of the algorithm is characterized using a number of metrics. These include the number of samples saved vs. fixed-rate sampling, the risk-reduction achieved vs. the risk-reduction possible with frequent sampling, and the difference between the switching time vs. the theoretical optimal switching time. The algorithm is applied to simulated patient data generated from a family of data-driven patient models and corrupted by experimentally confirmed levels of log-normal noise.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalAnti-HIV AgentsBiomarkersComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFeedbackHumansSample SizeTreatment OutcomeViral LoadAnti-HIV AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID22254264
PMCPMC3485444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.