ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2012
Recent concepts for the roles of progenitor/stem cell niche in heart repair.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypoxia-stressed cardiomyocytes promote early cardiac differentiation of cardiac stem cells through HIF-1Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2018Article
- Reduction of Na/K-ATPase affects cardiac remodeling and increases c-kit cell abundance in partial nephrectomized mice.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2014Article
- Design and formulation of functional pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Cardiac stem cell niche, MMP9, and culture and differentiation of embryonic stem cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progenitor/stem cell (PSC) has shown great promise for generation in failing heart. Advances in PSC biology have greatly enhanced our understanding of how PSC self-renewal, migration, maintenance of stemness, and cell-fate commitment depend on the balance of complex signals in their microenvironment. Endogenous PSC exists within structural and functional units known as PSC niches, which play important roles in directing PSC behavior. Recent years have witnessed great progress in our understanding of the PSC niche in cardiovascular biology. PSC based therapy could lead to successful cardiac regeneration or repair. Realizing the potential of therapeutic strategies is based on 1) differentiation of the PSC into all of the cellular constituents of the heart; 2) release of paracrine/ autocrine factors from the PSC; 3) fusion of the PSC with the existing constituents of the heart; and 4) stimulation of endogenous repair (regeneration of PSC niches). Importantly, cardiac PSC niches contain supporting cells and these cell-cell interactions have crucial regulatory roles in PSC based therapy. These findings have important implications for heart development, bioengineering, and furthermore elucidate a broader dimension of PSC control within the niche toward cardiomyocyte phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22254217PMC3257154W1536865992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.