Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22253928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Henipavirus neutralising antibodies in an isolated island population of African fruit bats.

Alison J Peel, Kate S Baker, Gary Crameri, Jennifer A Barr, David T S Hayman, Edward Wright, Christopher C Broder, Andrés Fernández-Loras, Anthony R Fooks, Lin-Fa Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prioritizing surveillance of Nipah virus in India.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nipah virus dynamics in bats and implications for spillover to humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sampling to elucidate the dynamics of infections in reservoir hosts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. What is stirring in the reservoir? Modelling mechanisms of henipavirus circulation in fruit bat hosts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Alison J PeelDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. alisonpeel@gmail.com
Kate S Baker
Gary Crameri
Jennifer A Barr
David T S Hayman
Edward Wright
Christopher C Broder
Andrés Fernández-Loras
Anthony R Fooks
Lin-Fa Wang
Andrew A Cunningham
James L N Wood
University of Cambridge · GBAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AUZoological Society of London · GBBridge University · SSCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUNational Consortium for Zoonosis Research · GBUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of Westminster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801176Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolated islands provide valuable opportunities to study the persistence of viruses in wildlife populations, including population size thresholds such as the critical community size. The straw-coloured fruit bat, Eidolon helvum, has been identified as a reservoir for henipaviruses (serological evidence) and Lagos bat virus (LBV; virus isolation and serological evidence) in continental Africa. Here, we sampled from a remote population of E. helvum annobonensis fruit bats on Annobón island in the Gulf of Guinea to investigate whether antibodies to these viruses also exist in this isolated subspecies. Henipavirus serological analyses (Luminex multiplexed binding and inhibition assays, virus neutralisation tests and western blots) and lyssavirus serological analyses (LBV: modified Fluorescent Antibody Virus Neutralisation test, LBV and Mokola virus: lentivirus pseudovirus neutralisation assay) were undertaken on 73 and 70 samples respectively. Given the isolation of fruit bats on Annobón and their lack of connectivity with other populations, it was expected that the population size on the island would be too small to allow persistence of viruses that are thought to cause acute and immunising infections. However, the presence of antibodies against henipaviruses was detected using the Luminex binding assay and confirmed using alternative assays. Neutralising antibodies to LBV were detected in one bat using both assays. We demonstrate clear evidence for exposure of multiple individuals to henipaviruses in this remote population of E. helvum annobonensis fruit bats on Annobón island. The situation is less clear for LBV. Seroprevalences to henipaviruses and LBV in Annobón are notably different to those in E. helvum in continental locations studied using the same sampling techniques and assays. Whilst cross-sectional serological studies in wildlife populations cannot provide details on viral dynamics within populations, valuable information on the presence or absence of viruses may be obtained and utilised for informing future studies.

Indexed as

GeographyAfricaAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBlotting, WesternChiropteraExtremitiesFemaleFluorescenceHenipavirusMaleAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID22253928
PMCPMC3257271
OpenAlexW1976749229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.