ArticlePloS one2012
Rapid plant identification using species- and group-specific primers targeting chloroplast DNA.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cultivar to chemotype: characterizing complex botanicals with mass spectrometry metabolomics.Natural product reports · 2026Review
- Decay of Food DNA in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Molecular Dietary Records.Nutrients · 2025Article
- What Hides in the Heights? The Case of the Iberian EndemismPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Rapid PCR-based method for herbivore dietary evaluation using plant-specific primers.PloS one · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes in Vasconcellea pubescens A.DC. and Carica papaya L.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- When to use next generation sequencing or diagnostic PCR in diet analyses.Molecular ecology resources · 2019Article
- Method for the Identification of Taxon-SpecificFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- The specific host plant DNA detection suggests a potential migration of Apolygus lucorum from cotton to mungbean fields.PloS one · 2017Article
- A molecular identification protocol for roots of boreal forest tree species.Applications in plant sciences · 2014Article
- How generalist herbivores exploit belowground plant diversity in temperate grasslands.Molecular ecology · 2014Article
- Group-specific multiplex PCR detection systems for the identification of flying insect prey.PloS one · 2014Article
- The effect of plant identity and the level of plant decay on molecular gut content analysis in a herbivorous soil insect.Molecular ecology resources · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant identification is challenging when no morphologically assignable parts are available. There is a lack of broadly applicable methods for identifying plants in this situation, for example when roots grow in mixture and for decayed or semi-digested plant material. These difficulties have also impeded the progress made in ecological disciplines such as soil- and trophic ecology. Here, a PCR-based approach is presented which allows identifying a variety of plant taxa commonly occurring in Central European agricultural land. Based on the trnT-F cpDNA region, PCR assays were developed to identify two plant families (Poaceae and Apiaceae), the genera Trifolium and Plantago, and nine plant species: Achillea millefolium, Fagopyrum esculentum, Lolium perenne, Lupinus angustifolius, Phaseolus coccineus, Sinapis alba, Taraxacum officinale, Triticum aestivum, and Zea mays. These assays allowed identification of plants based on size-specific amplicons ranging from 116 bp to 381 bp. Their specificity and sensitivity was consistently high, enabling the detection of small amounts of plant DNA, for example, in decaying plant material and in the intestine or faeces of herbivores. To increase the efficacy of identifying plant species from large number of samples, specific primers were combined in multiplex PCRs, allowing screening for multiple species within a single reaction. The molecular assays outlined here will be applicable manifold, such as for root- and leaf litter identification, botanical trace evidence, and the analysis of herbivory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.