Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22253475›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2012

A single amino acid determines the toxicity of Ginkgo biloba extracts.

Andrew J Thompson, Ian McGonigle, Rujee Duke, Graham A R Johnston, Sarah C R Lummis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic, Mechanistic, and Biological Interrogation ofJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review of Ginkgo biloba-induced toxicity, from experimental studies to human case reports.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Discriminating between 5-HT₃A and 5-HT₃AB receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew J ThompsonDepartment of Biochemistry, Tennis Court Rd., Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK.
Ian McGonigle
Rujee Duke
Graham A R Johnston
Sarah C R Lummis
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 81925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ginkgo biloba extracts are currently used for a wide range of health-related conditions. Some of the medical benefits of these extracts are controversial, but their lack of toxicity in humans is not in doubt. These extracts are, however, highly toxic to insects. Their active components (ginkgolides and bilobalide) have structures similar to the convulsant picrotoxin, a GABA(A) receptor antagonist, so their lack of toxicity in mammals is puzzling. Here, we show that the different compositions of insect and vertebrate GABA receptor pores are responsible for the differing toxicities. Insect GABA receptors contain Ala at their 2' position in the pore. Substitution with Val, which is the equivalent residue in vertebrate GABA(A) receptor α-subunits, decreases ginkgolide potency by up to 10,000-fold. The reverse mutation in vertebrate GABA(A) α1 subunits increased the sensitivity of α1β2 and α1β2γ2 receptors to ginkgolides. Mutant cycle analysis demonstrates a strong interaction between the ginkgolides and the 2' residue, a result supported by in silico docking of compounds into a model of the pore. We conclude that the insecticidal activity of G. biloba extracts can be attributed to their effects at insect GABA receptors, and the presence of a Val at the 2' position in vertebrate GABA(A) receptors explains why these compounds are not similarly toxic to humans.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCells, CulturedGABA AntagonistsGinkgo bilobaMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPlant ExtractsReceptors, GABA-ASequence Homology, Amino AcidXenopus laevisAmino AcidsGABA AntagonistsPlant ExtractsReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID22253475
PMCPMC3336786
OpenAlexW2121043573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.