SynthesisJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2012
Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating an Online Interprofessional Chronic Pain Management Group for Survivors of Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study With Cancer Patients at the CECON Foundation's Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Service: Meditation With Immersive Virtual Reality for Pain Relief
Who cites it
126 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.
- External treatment of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Global research trends of acupuncture therapy on cancer pain: A bibliometric and visualized study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Are mind-body therapies effective for relieving cancer-related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psycho-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Psychosocial Interventions for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current oncology reports · 2020Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions to enhance self-efficacy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Psycho-oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Standards for the management of cancer-related pain across Europe-A position paper from the EFIC Task Force on Cancer Pain.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2019Guideline
- SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of cancer pain (2017).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018Guideline
- An umbrella review of the literature on the effectiveness of psychological interventions for pain reduction.BMC psychology · 2017Pooled it
- Multidimensional Treatment of Cancer Pain.Current oncology reports · 2017Pooled it
- [Psychological treatments for pain in cancer patients : A systematic review on the current state of research].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Pooled it
- Non-pharmacological cancer pain interventions in populations with social disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Pooled it
- Survivorship: pain version 1.2014.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2014Guideline
- Optimal patient education for cancer pain: a systematic review and theory-based meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2013Pooled it
- Adult cancer pain.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2013Guideline
- An Overview of Systematic Reviews: Complementary Therapies for Cancer Patients.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Patient, family caregiver, and economic outcomes of an integrated screening and novel stepped collaborative care intervention in the oncology setting in the USA (CARES): a randomised, parallel, phase 3 trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Development and pre-pilot testing of STAMP + CBT: an mHealth app combining pain cognitive behavioral therapy and opioid support for patients with advanced cancer and pain.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Trial
66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePain is one of the most common, burdensome, and feared symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. American Pain Society standards for pain management in cancer recommend both pharmacologic and psychosocial approaches. To obtain a current, stable, and comprehensive estimate of the effect of psychosocial interventions on pain-an important clinical topic-we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies among adult patients with cancer published between 1966 and 2010.
methodsThree pairs of raters independently reviewed 1,681 abstracts, with a systematic process for reconciling disagreement, yielding 42 papers, of which 37 had sufficient data for meta-analysis. Studies were assessed for quality using a modified seven-item Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) coding scheme. Pain severity and interference were primary outcome measures.
resultsStudy participants (N = 4,199) were primarily women (66%) and white (72%). The weighted averaged effect size across studies for pain severity (38 comparisons) was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.46; P < .001), and the effect size for pain interference (four comparisons) was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.60; P < .001). Studies that monitored whether treatment was delivered as intended had larger effects than those that did not (P = .04).
conclusionPsychosocial interventions had medium-size effects on both pain severity and interference. These robust findings support the systematic implementation of quality-controlled psychosocial interventions as part of a multimodal approach to the management of pain in patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.