Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22252883›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2013

The unconditioned stimulus pre-exposure effect in preweanling rats in taste aversion learning: role of the training context and injection cues.

D A Revillo, C Arias, N E Spear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D A Revillo *Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, CP 5000 Argentina.
C Arias *Instituto de Investigación Médica M. y M. Ferreyra (INIMEC - CONICET), Córdoba, C.P 5000, Argentina.
N E SpearCenter for Developmental Psychobiology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA.

Funding

Social Anxiety, Stress and Ethanol Sensitivity in Adolescence and AdulthoodP50AA017823 · NIAAA · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI Marvin Rafael Diaz · 2009 to 2026
$30.5M
Ethanol Intake and Reinforcement in Infant RatsR01AA013098 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 2002 to 2012
$2.8M
EARLY ETHANOL--ANALYSIS AND PERSISTENCE OF CONSEQUENCESR01AA011960 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1998 to 2008
$1.8M
Ontogeny of Response to Ethanol After Prenatal EthanolR01AA015992 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
STIMULUS SELECTION AND INFANTILE AMNESIA ALLEVIATIONR01MH035219 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1985 to 2005
$1.1M
EARLY EXPERIENCE EFFECTS ON RESPONSIVENESS TO ETHANOLR01AA010223 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1995 to 1999
–
CONSEQUENCES OF ACUTE ETHANOL EXPOSURE DURING ONTOGENYR01AA006634 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1988 to 1994
–
STIMULUS SELECTION &INFANTILE AMNESIA ALLEVIATIONR37MH035219 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, NORMAN E · 1990 to 1999
–
NIAAA NIH HHS AA013098NIAAA NIH HHS AA015992NIAAA NIH HHS AA11960NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA017823NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA006634NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010223NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011960NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013098NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015992NIMH NIH HHS MH035219NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH035219NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH035219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unconditioned stimulus pre-exposure effect (US-PE) refers to the interference paradigm in which acquisition of the conditioned response is retarded due to prior experience with the US. Most studies analyzing the psychological mechanisms underlying this effect have been conducted with adult rats. The most widely accepted hypothesis explains this effect as a contextual blocking effect. Contextual cues associated with the US block the conditioned stimulus (CS)-US association during conditioning. The modulatory role of a context devoid of distinctive olfactory attributes is not observable until approximately PD23 in rats, including modulation of interference paradigms such as latent inhibition or extinction. In this study, we analyzed US-PE in preweanling rats along with the role of the training context in this effect in terms of conditioned taste aversion preparation. Pre-exposure to LiCl before conditioning retarded the acquisition of taste aversion. The US-PE was observed in preweanling rats when, during pre-exposure, subjects were exposed to the conditioning context, and this effect was not attenuated either by the administration of the US in a familiar environment (Experiment 1a), or by the presence of an alternative, more salient context during pre-exposure (Experiment 1b). Additionally, the US-PE was still observed when the route by which the US was administered was changed between the pre-exposure and conditioning phases (Experiment 2a) as well as when the injection cues were removed during conditioning (Experiment 2b). These experiments show a strong US-PE in preweanling rats and fail to support the contextual blocking hypothesis, at least in this stage of ontogeny.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalExtinction, PsychologicalLithium ChlorideRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySaccharinTasteLithium ChlorideSaccharin

Identifiers

PMID22252883
PMCPMC4652302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.