ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012
Differential use of CCR5 by HIV-1 clinical isolates resistant to small-molecule CCR5 antagonists.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vicriviroc resistance decay and relative replicative fitness in HIV-1 clinical isolates under sequential drug selection pressures.Journal of virology · 2012Trial
- CCR5 susceptibility to ligand-mediated down-modulation differs between human T lymphocytes and myeloid cells.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2015Article
- A common mechanism of clinical HIV-1 resistance to the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc despite divergent resistance levels and lack of common gp120 resistance mutations.Retrovirology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
How HIV-1 resistant to small-molecule CCR5 antagonists uses the coreceptor for entry has been studied in a limited number of isolates. We characterized dependence on the N terminus (NT) and the second extracellular loop (ECL2) of CCR5 of three vicriviroc (VCV)-resistant clinical isolates broadly cross-resistant to other CCR5 antagonists. Pseudoviruses were constructed to assess CCR5 use by VCV-sensitive and -resistant envelopes of subtype B and C viruses. We determined the extent of entry inhibition by monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the NT and ECL2 in the presence and absence of VCV and the capacity of these pseudoviruses to use CCR5 mutants that contained scanning alanine substitutions in the CCR5 NT and ECL2 domains. Sensitive and resistant viruses were completely and competitively inhibited by the ECL2-specific MAb 2D7, whereas the NT-specific MAb CTC5 led to partial noncompetitive inhibition. VCV-resistant clones showed greater sensitivity to 2D7 than VCV-sensitive clones, but in the presence of saturating VCV concentrations, the 2D7 susceptibilities of two VCV-resistant viruses were similar to that of VCV-sensitive virus. The entry of VCV-sensitive and -resistant isolates was impaired to differing degrees by alanine mutations in CCR5; substitutions in NT had the greatest effect on viral entry. HIV-1 clinical isolates broadly resistant to CCR5 antagonists demonstrated significant heterogeneity in their use of CCR5. This heterogeneity makes it difficult to draw general conclusions about the relationship between patterns of CCR5 antagonist resistance and the use of specific CCR5 domains for entry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.