ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012
Telavancin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections and various degrees of renal function.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics of Telavancin in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis during Acute Pulmonary Exacerbation.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Trial
- A population pharmacokinetic model of intravenous telavancin in healthy individuals to assess tissue exposure.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2019Trial
- Population pharmacokinetics of telavancin in healthy subjects and patients with infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2012Trial
- Population pharmacokinetic analyses for telavancin using data from healthy subjects and patients with infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetics of Telavancin at Fixed Doses in Normal-Body-Weight and Obese (Classes I, II, and III) Adult Subjects.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Article
- Telavancin: a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide agent to counter the challenge of resistant Gram-positive pathogens.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease · 2017Review
- Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Telavancin and Aztreonam or Piperacillin/Tazobactam Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2016Article
- Lipoglycopeptide Antibacterial Agents in Gram-Positive Infections: A Comparative Review.Drugs · 2015Review
- Variability in telavancin cross-reactivity among vancomycin immunoassays.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Article
- Successful target attainment of telavancin at elevated MICs: fact or fiction?Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study characterized the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved telavancin renal dose adjustment schemes. A previously published two-compartment open model with first-order elimination and a combined additive and proportional residual error model derived from 749 adult subjects in 11 clinical trials was used to simulate the individual concentration-time profiles for 10,260 subjects (NONMEM). The dosing regimens simulated were 10 mg/kg of body weight once daily for individuals with creatinine clearances (CL(CR)s) of >50 ml/min, 7.5 mg/kg once daily for individuals with CL(CR)s of 30 to 50 ml/min, and 10 mg/kg every 2 days for those with CL(CR)s of <30 ml/min. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) under one dosing interval (AUC(τ)) was computed as dose/CL. The probability of achieving an AUC(τ)/MIC ratio of ≥ 219 was evaluated separately for each renal dosing scheme. Evaluation of the dosing regimens demonstrated similar AUC values across the different renal function groups. For all renal dosing strata, >90% of the simulated subjects achieved an AUC(τ)/MIC ratio of ≥ 219 for MIC values as high as 2 mg/liter. For patients with CL(CR)s of <30 ml/min, the probability of target attainment (PTA) exceeded 90% for both the AUC₀₋₂₄ (AUC from 0 to 24 h) and AUC₂₄₋₄₈ intervals for MICs of ≤ 1 mg/liter. At a MIC of 2 mg/liter, the PTAs were 89.3% and 23.6% for the AUC₀₋₂₄ and AUC₂₄₋₄₈ intervals, respectively. The comparable PTA profiles for the three dosing regimens across their respective dosing intervals indicate that the dose adjustments employed in phase III trials for complicated skin and skin structure infections were appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.