Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22252528›Full record

Trial reportJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2012

Impact of a work-focused intervention on the productivity and symptoms of employees with depression.

Debra Lerner, David Adler, Richard C Hermann, Hong Chang, Evette J Ludman, Annabel Greenhill, Katherine Perch, William C McPeck, William H Rogers

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conceptual Framework of a Psychotherapeutic Consultation in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Cardiovascular Health Research in the Workplace: A Workshop Report.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cognitive Deficits as a Mediator of Poor Occupational Function in Remitted Major Depressive Disorder Patients.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Debra LernerProgram on Health, Work and Productivity, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Dlerner@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
David Adler
Richard C Hermann
Hong Chang
Evette J Ludman
Annabel Greenhill
Katherine Perch
William C McPeck
William H Rogers
Water Sanitation and Hygiene Institute · INTufts University · US

Funding

Reducing Depression's Impact on Work PerformanceR34MH072735 · NIMH · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LERNER, DEBRA · 2005 to 2007
$650k
NIMH NIH HHS 1 R34 MH072735-01A1NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH072735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test a new program's effectiveness in reducing depression's work burden.

methodsA brief telephonic program to improve work functioning was tested in an early-stage randomized controlled trial involving 79 Maine State Government employees who were screened in for depression and at-work limitations (treatment group = 59; usual care group = 27). Group differences in baseline to follow-up change scores on the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), WLQ Absence Module, and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression severity scale were tested with analysis of covariance.

resultsAlthough there were no baseline group differences (P ≥ 0.05), by follow-up, the treatment group had significantly better scores on every outcome and differences in the longitudinal changes were all statistically significant (P = 0.0.27 to 0.0001).

conclusionsThe new program was superior to usual care. The estimated productivity cost savings is $6041.70 per participant annually.

Indexed as

AdultDepressionEfficiency, OrganizationalFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaineMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22252528
PMCPMC3281506
OpenAlexW1991635039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.