ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2012
Evolutionary dynamics of protein domain architecture in plants.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- PlantGATA: a comprehensive database for plant GATA transcription factors.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Evolution of protein domains and protein domain combinations provides insights into the origin and diversification of land plants.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Phylogenomic profile of exon-intron organization across angiosperms, their relationships with protein domains, and functional implications.Nature communications · 2026Article
- In silico analysis of L- and G-type lectin receptor kinases in tomato: evolution, diversity, and abiotic responses.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Analysis of Plant Small RNA 2'-O-Methyltransferase (HEN1) Protein Family.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Recent Insights into Plant miRNA Biogenesis: Multiple Layers of miRNA Level Regulation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- TIAMMAt: Leveraging Biodiversity to Revise Protein Domain Models, Evidence from Innate Immunity.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Mix and match: Patchwork domain evolution of the land plant-specific Ca2+-permeable mechanosensitive channel MCA.PloS one · 2021Article
- Using Cellular Automata to Simulate Domain Evolution in Proteins.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Evolutionary Analysis of JAZ Proteins in Plants: An Approach in Search of the Ancestral Sequence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Domain-based Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Proteomes: Uniqueness, Interactions, and the Dark Matter.Current genomics · 2019Article
- Order in Disorder as Observed by the "Hydrophobic Cluster Analysis" of Protein Sequences.Proteomics · 2018Review
- Evolution of DDB1-binding WD40 (DWD) in the viridiplantae.PloS one · 2018Article
- Review
- Comparative Study of Lectin Domains in Model Species: New Insights into Evolutionary Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Presence of unique glyoxalase III proteins in plants indicates the existence of shorter route for methylglyoxal detoxification.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Analyses of Old "Prokaryotic" Proteins Indicate Functional Diversification in Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Distribution and evolution of the lectin family in soybean (Glycine max).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- P³DB 3.0: From plant phosphorylation sites to protein networks.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- The Lesion Simulating Disease (LSD) gene family as a variable in soybean response to Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection and dehydration.Functional & integrative genomics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProtein domains are the structural, functional and evolutionary units of the protein. Protein domain architectures are the linear arrangements of domain(s) in individual proteins. Although the evolutionary history of protein domain architecture has been extensively studied in microorganisms, the evolutionary dynamics of domain architecture in the plant kingdom remains largely undefined. To address this question, we analyzed the lineage-based protein domain architecture content in 14 completed green plant genomes.
resultsOur analyses show that all 14 plant genomes maintain similar distributions of species-specific, single-domain, and multi-domain architectures. Approximately 65% of plant domain architectures are universally present in all plant lineages, while the remaining architectures are lineage-specific. Clear examples are seen of both the loss and gain of specific protein architectures in higher plants. There has been a dynamic, lineage-wise expansion of domain architectures during plant evolution. The data suggest that this expansion can be largely explained by changes in nuclear ploidy resulting from rounds of whole genome duplications. Indeed, there has been a decrease in the number of unique domain architectures when the genomes were normalized into a presumed ancestral genome that has not undergone whole genome duplications.
conclusionsOur data show the conservation of universal domain architectures in all available plant genomes, indicating the presence of an evolutionarily conserved, core set of protein components. However, the occurrence of lineage-specific domain architectures indicates that domain architecture diversity has been maintained beyond these core components in plant genomes. Although several features of genome-wide domain architecture content are conserved in plants, the data clearly demonstrate lineage-wise, progressive changes and expansions of individual protein domain architectures, reinforcing the notion that plant genomes have undergone dynamic evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.