Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22250028›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2012

Pediatric analgesic clinical trial designs, measures, and extrapolation: report of an FDA scientific workshop.

Charles B Berde, Gary A Walco, Elliot J Krane, K J S Anand, Jacob V Aranda, Kenneth D Craig, Carlton D Dampier, Julia C Finkel, Martin Grabois, Celeste Johnston and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03914365 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Nerve Block to Ultrasound-guided Penile Nerve Block for Analgesia Following Pediatric Circumcision

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled300ConditionsMale Circumcision, Regional AnesthesiaArmsUltrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) and Ultrasound-guided penile nerve block (DPNB)
NCT04016246 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Respiratory Effect of the LISA (Less Invasive Surfactant Administration) Method With Sedation by Propofol Versus Absence of Sedation: Double-blind Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2019 to 2026Enrolled233ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature InfantArmsPropofol-Lipuro, Placebos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Morphine compared to placebo for procedural pain in preterm infants: safety, efficacy and equipoise.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles B BerdeDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA. charles.berde@childrens.harvard.edu
Gary A Walco
Elliot J Krane
K J S Anand
Jacob V Aranda
Kenneth D Craig
Carlton D Dampier
Julia C Finkel
Martin Grabois
Celeste Johnston
John Lantos
Alyssa Lebel
Lynne G Maxwell
Patrick McGrath
Timothy F Oberlander
Laura E Schanberg
Bonnie Stevens
Anna Taddio
Carl L von Baeyer
Myron Yaster
William T Zempsky
Harvard University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBC Children's Hospital · CAChildren's Hospital of Michigan · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USChildren's National · USDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USHospital for Sick Children · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAJohns Hopkins Hospital · USMcGill University · CAStanford University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

PEDIATRIC PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH UNITU01HD037261 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ARANDA, JACOB V · 1999 to 2003
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD037261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analgesic trials pose unique scientific, ethical, and practical challenges in pediatrics. Participants in a scientific workshop sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration developed consensus on aspects of pediatric analgesic clinical trial design. The standard parallel-placebo analgesic trial design commonly used for adults has ethical and practical difficulties in pediatrics, due to the likelihood of subjects experiencing pain for extended periods of time. Immediate-rescue designs using opioid-sparing, rather than pain scores, as a primary outcome measure have been successfully used in pediatric analgesic efficacy trials. These designs maintain some of the scientific benefits of blinding, with some ethical and practical advantages over traditional designs. Preferred outcome measures were recommended for each age group. Acute pain trials are feasible for children undergoing surgery. Pharmacodynamic responses to opioids, local anesthetics, acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs appear substantially mature by age 2 years. There is currently no clear evidence for analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in neonates or infants younger than 3 months of age. Small sample designs, including cross-over trials and N of 1 trials, for particular pediatric chronic pain conditions and for studies of pain and irritability in pediatric palliative care should be considered. Pediatric analgesic trials can be improved by using innovative study designs and outcome measures specific for children. Multicenter consortia will help to facilitate adequately powered pediatric analgesic trials.

Indexed as

EducationResearch DesignUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdultAge FactorsAnalgesicsChildChild, PreschoolChronic PainClinical Trials as TopicEthics, MedicalFeasibility StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID22250028
PMCPMC9923552
OpenAlexW2029215547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.