Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22249704›Full record

ArticleDer Radiologe2012

[Update on interstitial brachytherapy].

T Bretschneider, N Peters, P Hass, J Ricke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Radiologe, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T BretschneiderZentrum für Radiologie, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum A.ö.R. der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. tina.bretschneider@med.ovgu.de
N Peters
P Hass
J Ricke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueMinimally invasive treatment procedures, such as image-guided local tumour ablation have gained increasing relevance in oncologic concepts. Limitations of thermal ablation procedures have led to the development of percutaneous, computed tomography (CT) guided brachytherapy. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsThermal ablation procedures, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) show limitations regarding maximum tumour size (<5 cm), cooling effects of adjacent vessels and surrounding risk structures. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The image-guided interstitial brachytherapy allows the single application of high-dose rate (HDR) irradiation with an extensive protracted cytotoxic effect. Adjacent risk structures play a minor role due to the steep dose gradient outside the clinical target volume. PERFORMANCE: Studies using CT-guided brachytherapy resulted in a local tumour control rate of approximately 90% after 12 months in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 70-90% in the treatment of colorectal metastases or cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). Similar response rates were also seen in the treatment of metastases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or neuroendocrine tumours. In colorectal liver metastases and HCC the method has proven to have a positive impact on prognosis. ACHIEVEMENTS: In contrast to thermal ablation the method can be used without restriction with respect to tumour location. Cooling effects do not play a role. It has already been applied in more than 5,000 cases and it is used in clinical routine. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Image-guided brachytherapy is safe and effective and has found its way into the clinical routine.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyCarcinoma, HepatocellularHumansLiver NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.