Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22249277›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2012

Does bladder wall thickness decrease when obstruction is resolved?

Annette Kuhn, Sonja Brandner, Peter Kuhn, Dudley Robinson, Luigi Raio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annette KuhnUrogynaecology, Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital and University of Bern, Effingerstrasse 102, CH 3010 Bern, Switzerland. annette.kuhn@insel.ch
Sonja Brandner
Peter Kuhn
Dudley Robinson
Luigi Raio
University of Bern · CHKing's College School · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of the current study was to determine if sonographic bladder wall thickness diminishes after symptomatic obstruction is resolved in female patients after stress incontinence surgery.

methodsBetween December 2008 and December 2010, 62 female patients with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction, as defined by Blaivas, who had undergone prior surgery for urinary stress incontinence were included in the study. The patients' history was taken and symptoms were noted. Patients underwent gynaecological examination, and multichannel urodynamic assessment was performed. Vaginal sonographic assessment of the bladder wall thickness (BWT) was performed before and after urethrolysis.

results62 patients were included in this study, 55 of whom had undergone suburethral sling insertion and seven had Burch colposuspension. Postoperatively, BWT decreased significantly from 9.1 mm  ±  2.1 to 7.6 mm  ±  2.2 (p < 0.0001). In seven patients, obstruction was still unresolved postoperatively; of these, two had undergone a retropubic sling insertion and two had a Burch colposuspension. An ROC curve analysis showed a significant positive association between residual urine and persistent obstruction before surgery (AUC 0.76, 95%CI 0.58-0.94; p < 0.05).

conclusionsIf obstruction is resolved, bladder wall thickness decreases. Preoperatively elevated residual urine may increase the risk of persistent obstruction after urethrolysis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMiddle AgedROC CurveStatistics, NonparametricSuburethral SlingsUltrasonographyUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder Neck ObstructionUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Retention

Identifiers

PMID22249277
OpenAlexW1979079413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.