Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22249206›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2012

Epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity.

Angela K Deem, Xuan Li, Jessica K Tyler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Correlating histone acetylation with nucleosome core particle dynamics and function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Epigenetic Regulation of Nucleotide Excision Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angela K DeemDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Xuan Li
Jessica K Tyler

Funding

Chromatin's Role in Repair of Radiation-induced Damage.R01CA095641 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI TYLER, JESSICA K · 2002 to 2023
$5.2M
Chromatin Assembly, Structure and FunctionR01GM064475 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI TYLER, JESSICA K · 2002 to 2019
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095641NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inefficient and inaccurate repair of DNA damage is the principal cause of DNA mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and carcinogenesis. Numerous multiple-step DNA repair pathways exist whose deployment depends on the nature of the DNA lesion. Common to all eukaryotic DNA repair pathways is the need to unravel the compacted chromatin structure to facilitate access of the repair machinery to the DNA and restoration of the original chromatin state afterward. Accordingly, our cells utilize a plethora of coordinated mechanisms to locally open up the chromatin structure to reveal the underlying DNA sequence and to orchestrate the efficient and accurate repair of DNA lesions. Here we review changes to the chromatin structure that are intrinsic to the DNA damage response and the available mechanistic insight into how these chromatin changes facilitate distinct stages of the DNA damage repair pathways to maintain genomic stability.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedModels, BiologicalChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA RepairEpigenesis, GeneticGenomic InstabilityHistonesHistones

Identifiers

PMID22249206
PMCPMC3982914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.