Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22249195›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2012

Optical probes and techniques for O2 measurement in live cells and tissue.

Ruslan I Dmitriev, Dmitri B Papkovsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. FunctionalACS bio & med chem Au · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Analytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physiological oxygen measurementsFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  15. OFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  16. The Challenges of OInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Heterosubstituted Derivatives of PtPFPP for OBioconjugate chemistry · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruslan I DmitrievBiochemistry Department, University College Cork, Ireland.
Dmitri B Papkovsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in the sensing and imaging of molecular oxygen (O(2)) in biological samples containing live cells and tissue. We review recent developments in the measurement of O(2) in such samples by optical means, particularly using the phosphorescence quenching technique. The main types of soluble O(2) sensors are assessed, including small molecule, supramolecular and particle-based structures used as extracellular or intracellular probes in conjunction with different detection modalities and measurement formats. For the different O(2) sensing systems, particular attention is paid to their merits and limitations, analytical performance, general convenience and applicability in specific biological applications. The latter include measurement of O(2) consumption rate, sample oxygenation, sensing of intracellular O(2), metabolic assessment of cells, and O(2) imaging of tissue, vasculature and individual cells. Altogether, this gives the potential user a comprehensive guide for the proper selection of the appropriate optical probe(s) and detection platform to suit their particular biological applications and measurement requirements.

Indexed as

Optical DevicesAnimalsCell RespirationLuminescent MeasurementsMiceOxygenRatsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22249195
PMCPMC3371327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.