Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22249116›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2012

Stimulus dynamics increase the self-administration of compound visual and auditory stimuli.

Christopher M Olsen, Danny G Winder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher M OlsenDepartment of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-0615, USA. colsen@mcw.edu
Danny G Winder

Funding

Operant Sensation Seeking in the MouseR00DA026994 · NIDA · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI OLSEN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2012 to 2014
$698k
Operant Sensation Seeking in the MouseK99DA026994 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI OLSEN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2010 to 2011
$194k
NIDA NIH HHS DA026994NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA026994NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA026994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals will acquire an operant task using sensory stimuli as a primary reinforcer. Many operant tasks use sensory stimuli as cues that are paired with other primary reinforcers. Recent studies have called attention to this potential confound, but there has not been a parametric assessment of the effect of stimulus variability on operant responding. We found that stimulus variability increased the amount of operant responding exhibited by mice, a phenomenon observed under both fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationConditioning, OperantPhotic StimulationAnimalsCuesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReinforcement, PsychologySelf Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID22249116
PMCPMC3299404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.