Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22249110›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of disease2012

Delayed calcium dysregulation in neurons requires both the NMDA receptor and the reverse Na+/Ca2+ exchanger.

Matthew K Brittain, Tatiana Brustovetsky, Patrick L Sheets, Joel M Brittain, Rajesh Khanna, Theodore R Cummins, Nickolay Brustovetsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Honey on brain health: A promising brain booster.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Non-SUMOylated CRMP2 decreases NaMolecular brain · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew K BrittainDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Tatiana Brustovetsky
Patrick L Sheets
Joel M Brittain
Rajesh Khanna
Theodore R Cummins
Nickolay Brustovetsky
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Long-term neurobehavioral effects of ketamine exposure in adolescent miceR01DA023210 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SIEGEL, STEVEN J · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Mitochondrial Porin in Bioenergetic Defects in Huntingtons DiseaseR01NS078008 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BRUSTOVETSKY, NICKOLAY · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Release of Apoptogenic Proteins from Brain MitochondriaR01NS050131 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BRUSTOVETSKY, NICKOLAY · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS 5R01DA023210NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050131NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamate-induced delayed calcium dysregulation (DCD) is a causal factor leading to neuronal death. The mechanism of DCD is not clear but Ca2+ influx via N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) and/or the reverse plasmalemmal Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCXrev) could be involved in DCD. However, the extent to which NMDAR and NCX(rev) contribute to glutamate-induced DCD is uncertain. Here, we show that both NMDAR and NCX(rev) are critical for DCD in neurons exposed to excitotoxic glutamate. In rat cultured hippocampal neurons, 25 μM glutamate produced DCD accompanied by sustained increase in cytosolic Na+ ([Na+]c) and plasma membrane depolarization. MK801 and memantine, noncompetitive NMDAR inhibitors, added shortly after glutamate, completely prevented DCD whereas AP-5, a competitive NMDAR inhibitor, failed to protect against DCD. None of the tested inhibitors lowered elevated [Na+]c or restored plasma membrane potential. In the experiments with NCX reversal by gramicidin, MK801 and memantine robustly inhibited NCXrev while AP-5 was much less efficacious. In electrophysiological patch-clamp experiments MK801 and memantine inhibited NCXrev-mediated ion currents whereas AP-5 failed. Thus, MK801 and memantine, in addition to NMDAR, inhibited NCXrev. Inhibition of NCXrev either with KB-R7943, or by collapsing Na+ gradient across the plasma membrane, or by inhibiting Na+/H+ exchanger with 5-(N-ethyl-N-isopropyl) amiloride (EIPA) and thus preventing the increase in [Na+]c failed to preclude DCD. However, NCXrev inhibition combined with NMDAR blockade by AP-5 completely prevented DCD. Overall, our data suggest that both NMDAR and NCXrev are essential for DCD in glutamate-exposed neurons and inhibition of individual mechanism is not sufficient to prevent calcium dysregulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumGlutamic AcidHippocampusNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsPrimary Cell CultureRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSodium-Calcium ExchangerCalciumGlutamic AcidNeuroprotective AgentsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSodium-Calcium Exchanger

Identifiers

PMID22249110
PMCPMC3299854
OpenAlexW1999612879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.