Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22247757›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Attitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational study.

Andreas B Eisingerich, Ana Wheelock, Gabriela B Gomez, Geoffrey P Garnett, Mark R Dybul, Peter K Piot

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02852226 (Connecting Resources for Urban Sexual Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 143 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02852226 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Connecting Resources for Urban Sexual Health: CRUSH-PrEP for Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, HIVArmsPre Exposure Prophylaxis, Characteristics of women who enroll, referral sources of women who enroll
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas B EisingerichImperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. a.eisingerich@imperial.ac.uk
Ana Wheelock
Gabriela B Gomez
Geoffrey P Garnett
Mark R Dybul
Peter K Piot
Imperial College London · GBAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLGeorgetown University · USNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of antiviral medications by HIV negative people to prevent acquisition of HIV or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shown promising results in recent trials. To understand the potential impact of PrEP for HIV prevention, in addition to efficacy data, we need to understand both the acceptability of PrEP among members of potential user groups and the factors likely to determine uptake. METHODS AND

findingsSurveys of willingness to use PrEP products were conducted with 1,790 members of potential user groups (FSWs, MSM, IDUs, SDCs and young women) in seven countries: Peru, Ukraine, India, Kenya, Botswana, Uganda and South Africa. Analyses of variance were used to assess levels of acceptance across different user groups and countries. Conjoint analysis was used to examine the attitudes and preferences towards hypothetical and known attributes of PrEP programs and medications. Overall, members of potential user groups were willing to consider taking PrEP (61% reported that they would definitely use PrEP). Current results demonstrate that key user groups in different countries perceived PrEP as giving them new possibilities in their lives and would consider using it as soon as it becomes available. These results were maintained when subjects were reminded of potential side effects, the need to combine condom use with PrEP, and for regular HIV testing. Across populations, route of administration was considered the most important attribute of the presented alternatives.

conclusionsDespite multiple conceivable barriers, there was a general willingness to adopt PrEP in key populations, which suggests that if efficacious and affordable, it could be a useful tool in HIV prevention. There would be a willingness to experience inconvenience and expense at the levels included in the survey. The results suggest that delivery in a long lasting injection would be a good target in drug development.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansInternational AgenciesMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSouth AfricaYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID22247757
PMCPMC3256136
OpenAlexW1979325857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.