Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22247449›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2012

Combination therapy for mucormycosis: why, what, and how?

Brad Spellberg, Ashraf Ibrahim, Emmanuel Roilides, Russel E Lewis, Olivier Lortholary, George Petrikkos, Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis, Thomas J Walsh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Mucormycosis in 2023: an update on pathogenesis and management.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  17. Osteoarticular Mycoses.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Mucormycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Rhino-Orbito-Cerebral Mucormycosis in an Immunocompromised Patient.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2022
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Brad SpellbergDivision of General Internal Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California at Los Angeles, 1124 West Carson St., Torrance, CA 90502, USA. bspellberg@labiomed.org
Ashraf Ibrahim
Emmanuel Roilides
Russel E Lewis
Olivier Lortholary
George Petrikkos
Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Thomas J Walsh
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCornell University · USHippocration General Hospital · GRInstitut Pasteur · FRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRonald Reagan UCLA Medical Center · USThe Lundquist Institute · US

Funding

Novel Toxins and Receptors in Mucormycosis Pathogenesis and TreatmentR01AI063503 · NIAID · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI IBRAHIM, ASHRAF S. · 2006 to 2025
$7.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high mortality rate of mucormycosis with currently available monotherapy, particularly in hematology patients, has stimulated interest in studying novel combinations of antifungal agents to determine whether superior outcomes might be achieved. Combination lipid polyene-echinocandin therapy is the most promising of such regimens based on safety profile, the availability of parenteral formulations of echinocandins, their synergy in murine models of mucormycosis, and observational clinical data that are concordant. Other options include combination lipid polyene plus deferasirox or posaconazole therapy. Definitive, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials are needed to determine whether combination therapy with any of these options is superior to monotherapy. Until such studies are conducted, clinicians will continue to be placed in the unacceptable position of not knowing if and when to administer combination therapy. Such a state of confusion may lead to undertreatment if combination therapy is indeed superior but is not used and, conversely, may lead to unacceptable toxicity and cost to patients if combination therapy is not superior but is used. It is critical that sponsors step forward with funding to conduct these clinical trials to determine whether outcomes from these devastating infections can be improved.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsBenzoatesClinical Trials as TopicDeferasiroxDrug Therapy, CombinationEchinocandinsHumansLipidsMiceMucormycosisPolyenesTreatment OutcomeTriazolesAntifungal AgentsBenzoatesDeferasiroxEchinocandinsLipidsPolyenesposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID22247449
PMCPMC4542574
OpenAlexW2114432945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.