ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2012
Comparison of the prevalences and antimicrobial resistances of Escherichia coli isolates from different retail meats in the United States, 2002 to 2008.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serogroups, antibiotic resistance profiles and virulence factors of non-O157 Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli from ovine and caprine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genotypic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Multidrug-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Microbial Quality Assessment of Farmers' Market Food Products in Central Virginia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of food science · 2026Article
- Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in SelectedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Characteristics of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from retail meat products in North Carolina.PloS one · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in E. Coli of animal origin and discovery of a novel ICE mobile element in Northeast China.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Microbiological Survey and Antimicrobial Resistance of Foodborne Bacteria in Select Meat Products and Ethnic Food Products Procured from Food Desert Retail Outlets in Central Virginia, USA.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of Prevalence and Diversity of Antimicrobial ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Antibiotic Susceptibility ofInternational journal of food science · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Detection of tetracycline and streptomycin in beef tissues using Charm II, isolation of relevant resistant bacteria and control their resistance by gamma radiation.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- A One Health Comparative Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance in Generic and Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Metagenomic Characterization of the Microbiome and Resistome of Retail Ground Beef Products.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofInternational journal of food science · 2020Article
- Longitudinal Shedding Patterns and Characterization of Antibiotic ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria from Raw Meat of Buffalo and Chicken, Nepal.Veterinary medicine international · 2019Article
- Extraintestinal Pathogenic and Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli, Including Sequence Type 131 (ST131), from Retail Chicken Breasts in the United States in 2013.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escherichia coli isolates were recovered from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System retail meat program and examined for antimicrobial susceptibility. Retail meat samples (n = 11,921) from four U.S. states collected during 2002 to 2008, consisting of 2,988 chicken breast, 2,942 ground turkey, 2,991 ground beef, and 3,000 pork chop samples, were analyzed. A total of 8,286 E. coli isolates were recovered. The greatest numbers of samples contaminated with the organism were chicken (83.5%) and turkey (82.0%), followed by beef (68.9%) and pork (44.0%). Resistance was most common to tetracycline (50.3%), followed by streptomycin (34.6%), sulfamethoxazole-sulfisoxazole (31.6%), ampicillin (22.5%), gentamicin (18.6%), kanamycin (8.4%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (6.4%), and cefoxitin (5.2%). Less than 5% of the isolates had resistance to trimethoprim, ceftriaxone, ceftiofur, nalidixic acid, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin. Compared to beef and pork isolates, the poultry meat isolates had a greater percentage of resistance to all tested drugs, with the exception of chloramphenicol, to which pork isolates had the most resistance. More than half of the turkey isolates (56%) were resistant to multidrugs (≥3 classes) compared to 38.9% of chicken, 17.3% of pork, and 9.3% of beef isolates. The bla(CMY) gene was present in all ceftriaxone- and ceftiofur-resistant isolates. The cmlA, flo, and catI genes were present in 45%, 43%, and 40% of chloramphenicol-resistant isolates, respectively. Most nalidixic acid-resistant isolates (98.5%) had a gyrA mutation in S83 or D87 or both, whereas only 6.7% had a parC mutation in either S80 or E84. The results showed that E. coli was commonly present in the retail meats, and antimicrobial resistance profiles differed according to the animal origin of the isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.