Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22246644›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2012

Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up.

Christian Hellum, Lars Gunnar Johnsen, Øyvind Gjertsen, Linda Berg, Gesche Neckelmann, Oliver Grundnes, Ivar Rossvoll, Jan Sture Skouen, Jens Ivar Brox, Kjersti Storheim and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00394732 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Lumbar Disc Prosthesis Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Degenerative Disc. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Multicentre Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUllevaal University HospitalRan2004 to 2007Enrolled179ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain, Degenerative Disc DiseaseArmsTotal Disc Prosthesis, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
NCT01704677 nacompletednot on this map

Lumbar Disc Prosthesis Versus Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation in Chronic Back Pain and Localized Degenerative Disc. Long Term Follow-up of a Randomized Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2012 to 2015Enrolled151ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsLumbar total disc replacement, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Do MRI findings identify patients with low back pain or sciatica who respond better to particular interventions? A systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Lumbar total disc replacement: predictors for long-term outcome.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Trial
  7. Optimizing success with lumbar disc arthroplasty.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2014
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Immuno-Modulatory Effects of Intervertebral Disc Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  16. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2013
    Article
  17. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2012.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian HellumDepartment of Orthopaedics, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Kirkevn 166, 0407, Oslo, Norway. christian.hellum@medisin.uio.no
Lars Gunnar Johnsen
Øyvind Gjertsen
Linda Berg
Gesche Neckelmann
Oliver Grundnes
Ivar Rossvoll
Jan Sture Skouen
Jens Ivar Brox
Kjersti Storheim
Norwegian Spine Study Group
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA prospective study to evaluate whether certain baseline characteristics can predict outcome in patients treated with disc prosthesis or multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

methodsSecondary analysis of 154 patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) for at least 1 year and degenerative discs originally recruited for a randomized trial. Outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) dichotomized to < or ≥15 points improvement and whether subjects were working at 2-year follow-up. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used.

resultsIn patients treated with disc prosthesis, long duration of LBP and high Fear-Avoidance Beliefs for work (FABQ-W) predicted worse ODI outcome [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.2 and OR = 1.7, CI 1.2-2.4 for every 5 years or 5 points]. Modic type I or II predicted better ODI outcome (OR = 5.3, CI 1.1-25.3). In patients treated with rehabilitation, a high ODI, low emotional distress (HSCL-25), and no daily narcotics predicted better outcome for ODI (OR = 2.5, CI 1.4-4.5 for every 5 ODI points, OR = 2.1, CI 1.1-5.1 for every 0.5 HSCL points and OR = 23.6, CI 2.1-266.8 for no daily narcotics). Low FABQ-W and working at baseline predicted working at 2-year follow-up after both treatments (OR = 1.3, CI 1.0-1.5 for every 5 points and OR = 4.1, CI 1.2-13.2, respectively).

conclusionsShorter duration of LBP, Modic type I or II changes and low FABQ-W were the best predictors of success after treatment with disc prosthesis, while high ODI, low distress and not using narcotics daily predicted better outcome of rehabilitation. Low FABQ-W and working predicted working at follow-up.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAdultDisability EvaluationFearFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedNarcoticsPredictive Value of TestsNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID22246644
PMCPMC3326124
OpenAlexW2040375005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.